Evidence map›Paper›PMID 31068438›Full record

ArticleThe Journal of neuroscience : the official journal of the Society for Neuroscience2019

Interactions between Conscious and Subconscious Signals: Selective Attention under Feature-Based Competition Increases Neural Selectivity during Brain Adaptation.

Yukiko Kikuchi, Jennifer Ip, Gaëtan Lagier, James C Mossom, Sukhbinder Kumar, Christopher I Petkov, Nick E Barraclough, Quoc C Vuong

Open access · hybridAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in The Journal of neuroscience : the official journal of the Society for Neuroscience, 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
3citing papers in PubMed
0.5field-weighted citation impact, top 37% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

3 citing papers in PubMed, 6 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Review
  2. Article
  3. Structured sequence processing and combinatorial binding: neurobiologically and computationally informed hypotheses.Philosophical transactions of the Royal Society of London. Series B, Biological sciences · 2020
    Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

Yukiko KikuchiInstitute of Neuroscience, Henry Wellcome Building, Newcastle University, Framlington Place, Newcastle upon Tyne NE2 4HH, United Kingdom, and.ORCID 0000-0002-0365-0397
Jennifer IpInstitute of Neuroscience, Henry Wellcome Building, Newcastle University, Framlington Place, Newcastle upon Tyne NE2 4HH, United Kingdom, and.
Gaëtan LagierInstitute of Neuroscience, Henry Wellcome Building, Newcastle University, Framlington Place, Newcastle upon Tyne NE2 4HH, United Kingdom, and.
James C MossomInstitute of Neuroscience, Henry Wellcome Building, Newcastle University, Framlington Place, Newcastle upon Tyne NE2 4HH, United Kingdom, and.
Sukhbinder KumarInstitute of Neuroscience, Henry Wellcome Building, Newcastle University, Framlington Place, Newcastle upon Tyne NE2 4HH, United Kingdom, and.ORCID 0000-0003-3025-9040
Christopher I PetkovInstitute of Neuroscience, Henry Wellcome Building, Newcastle University, Framlington Place, Newcastle upon Tyne NE2 4HH, United Kingdom, and.ORCID 0000-0002-4932-7907
Nick E BarracloughDepartment of Psychology, University of York, Heslington, York YO10 5DD, United Kingdom nick.barraclough@york.ac.uk quoc.vuong@ncl.ac.uk.ORCID 0000-0003-2818-326X
Quoc C VuongInstitute of Neuroscience, Henry Wellcome Building, Newcastle University, Framlington Place, Newcastle upon Tyne NE2 4HH, United Kingdom, and nick.barraclough@york.ac.uk quoc.vuong@ncl.ac.uk.
Newcastle University · GBUniversity of York · GB

Funding

Biotechnology and Biological Sciences Research Council BB/J009849/1National Centre for the Replacement, Refinement and Reduction of Animals in Research NC/K000608/1Wellcome Trust 102961/Z/13/ZWellcome Trust WT092504Wellcome Trust WT102961MA
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Efficient perception in natural environments depends on neural interactions between voluntary processes within cognitive control, such as attention, and those that are automatic and subconscious, such as brain adaptation to predictable input (also called repetition suppression). Although both attention and adaptation have been studied separately and there is considerable knowledge of the neurobiology involved in each of these processes, how attention interacts with adaptation remains equivocal. We examined how attention interacts with visual and auditory adaptation by measuring neuroimaging effects consistent with changes in either neural gain or selectivity. Male and female human participants were scanned with functional magnetic resonance imaging (fMRI) first while they discriminated repetition of morphed faces or voices and either directed their attention to stimulus identity or spatial location. Attention to face or voice identity, while ignoring stimulus location, solely increased the gain of respectively face- or voice-sensitive cortex. The results were strikingly different in an experiment when participants attended to voice identity versus stimulus loudness. In this case, attention to voice while ignoring sound loudness increased neural selectivity. The combined results show that how attention affects adaptation depends on the level of feature-based competition, reconciling prior conflicting observations. The findings are theoretically important and are discussed in relation to neurobiological interactions between attention and different types of predictive signals.

Indexed as

Adaptation, PhysiologicalAttentionConsciousnessUnconscious, PsychologyAuditory PerceptionBrainFemaleHumansMagnetic Resonance ImagingMaleVisual PerceptionYoung Adultadaptationattentionauditionautomaticpredictionvision

Identifiers

PMID31068438
PMCPMC6616293
OpenAlexW2941049063

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.