ArticleJournal of virology2019
Article in Journal of virology, 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 9 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
9 citing papers in PubMed, 23 citations in OpenAlex.
- Microbiological and rheological dynamics of mixed biofilms formed by bacteria and eukaryotic virus.Scientific reports · 2026Article
- Using reverse genetics tool for study of Senecavirus A: pros and cons.Frontiers in veterinary science · 2025Article
- Akaluc bioluminescence offers superior sensitivity to trackiScience · 2024Article
- Cytocidal Effect of Irradiation on Gastric Cancer Cells Infected with a Recombinant Mammalian Orthoreovirus Expressing a Membrane-Targeted KillerRed.Pharmaceuticals (Basel, Switzerland) · 2024Article
- Article
- Blank Spots in the Map of Human Skin: The Challenge for Xenotransplantation.International journal of molecular sciences · 2023Review
- Generation of Genetically RGD σ1-Modified Oncolytic Reovirus That Enhances JAM-A-Independent Infection of Tumor Cells.Journal of virology · 2020Article
- Recovery of NanoLuc Luciferase-Tagged Canine Distemper Virus for Facilitating Rapid Screening of AntiviralsFrontiers in veterinary science · 2020Article
- Reovirus: Friend and Foe.Current clinical microbiology reports · 2019Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Wild-type mammalian reoviruses (MRVs) have been evaluated as oncolytic agents against various cancers; however, genetic modification methods for improving MRV agents have not been exploited fully. In the present study, using MRV strain T1L, we generated a reporter MRV that expresses a NanoLuc luciferase (NLuc) gene and used it for noninvasive imaging of MRV infection in tumor xenograft mice. NLuc and a P2A self-cleaving peptide gene cassette were placed upstream of the L1 gene open reading frame to enable bicistronic expression of NLuc and the L1 gene product. BALB/c nude mice intranasally infected with MRV expressing NLuc (rsT1L-NLuc) displayed bioluminescent signals in the chest area at 4 days postinfection (dpi), which is consistent with natural MRV infection in the lung. Furthermore, to monitor tumor-selective infection by MRV, nude mice bearing human cancer xenografts were infected intravenously with rsT1L-NLuc. Bioluminescent signals were detected in tumors as early as 3 dpi and persisted for 2 months. The results demonstrate the utility of an autonomous replicating reporter MRV for noninvasive live imaging of replicating oncolytic MRV agents.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.