ArticleJournal of the American Board of Family Medicine : JABFM
Patient Body Mass Index (BMI) Knowledge in a Rural Primary Care Population.
Article in Journal of the American Board of Family Medicine : JABFM. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed, 4 citations in OpenAlex.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.
Funding
Abstract
introductionBody mass index (BMI) is a traditional method of measuring obesity and an accepted quality measure in many health systems. However, little is known about how patients' understanding of BMI has progressed/changed in the last several years. The primary purpose of this study was to determine the change in patients' knowledge of BMI and weight-related risk factors. A secondary outcome of this study was to determine the incidence of physician discussion about BMI with the patient.
methodsWe administered an anonymous survey to primary care patients in 33 rural family medicine clinics in 2013 and 2017. The survey included 8 questions regarding BMI knowledge and 5 demographic questions.
resultsA total of 573 patients completed the survey. There were 345 participants from 2013 and 238 from 2017. The sample included more women than men. There was no significant difference in age or proportion of comorbidities across the 2 survey years. Compared with year 2013, more survey participants from year 2017 knew that BMI stood for "body mass index" (71.1% vs 61.2%,
conclusionIn this cross-sectional cohort study, it was found that patients' knowledge about BMI and weight-related risk factors has increased modestly. However, despite the increase in patients' knowledge and discussions about BMI with their primary care physician, there was not a decrease in BMI. Future studies are needed to provide more detailed information about the discussion between patients and providers in relation to the patient's personal weight status.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.