Evidence map›Paper›PMID 31068396›Full record

Trial reportJournal of the American Board of Family Medicine : JABFM

Patient-Refined Messaging for a Mailed Colorectal Cancer Screening Program: Findings from the PROMPT Study.

Gloria D Coronado, Jamie H Thompson, Amanda F Petrik, Denis B Nyongesa, Michael C Leo, Melissa Castillo, Brittany Younger, Anne Escaron, Alex Chen

Open access · diamondAbstract readComparative StudyRandomized Controlled Trial
In one paragraph

Trial report in Journal of the American Board of Family Medicine : JABFM. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 17 papers, 2 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
17citing papers in PubMed, 2 pooled it
1.6field-weighted citation impact, top 15% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

17 citing papers in PubMed, 2 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 32 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Trial
  4. Effectiveness and Cost of an Enhanced Mailed Fecal Test Outreach Colorectal Cancer Screening Program: Findings from the PROMPT Stepped-Wedge Trial.Cancer epidemiology, biomarkers & prevention : a publication of the American Association for Cancer Research, cosponsored by the American Society of Preventive Oncology · 2023
    Trial
  5. Randomized Controlled Trial of Advance Notification Phone Calls vs Text Messages Prior to Mailed Fecal Test Outreach.Clinical gastroenterology and hepatology : the official clinical practice journal of the American Gastroenterological Association · 2021
    Trial
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. The Reach of Calls and Text Messages for Mailed FIT Outreach in the PROMPT Stepped-Wedge Colorectal Cancer Screening Trial.Cancer epidemiology, biomarkers & prevention : a publication of the American Association for Cancer Research, cosponsored by the American Society of Preventive Oncology · 2024
    Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Improving colorectal cancer screening in rural primary care: Preliminary effectiveness and implementation of a collaborative mailed fecal immunochemical test pilot.The Journal of rural health : official journal of the American Rural Health Association and the National Rural Health Care Association · 2023
    Article
  13. Review
  14. Article
  15. Review
  16. Article
  17. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

9 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Gloria D CoronadoFrom Center for Health Research, Kaiser Permanente Northwest, Portland, OR (GDC, JHT, AFP, DBN, MCL); AltaMed Health Services, Los Angeles, CA (MC, BY, AE, AC). Gloria.D.Coronado@kpchr.org.
Jamie H ThompsonFrom Center for Health Research, Kaiser Permanente Northwest, Portland, OR (GDC, JHT, AFP, DBN, MCL); AltaMed Health Services, Los Angeles, CA (MC, BY, AE, AC).
Amanda F PetrikFrom Center for Health Research, Kaiser Permanente Northwest, Portland, OR (GDC, JHT, AFP, DBN, MCL); AltaMed Health Services, Los Angeles, CA (MC, BY, AE, AC).
Denis B NyongesaFrom Center for Health Research, Kaiser Permanente Northwest, Portland, OR (GDC, JHT, AFP, DBN, MCL); AltaMed Health Services, Los Angeles, CA (MC, BY, AE, AC).
Michael C LeoFrom Center for Health Research, Kaiser Permanente Northwest, Portland, OR (GDC, JHT, AFP, DBN, MCL); AltaMed Health Services, Los Angeles, CA (MC, BY, AE, AC).
Melissa CastilloFrom Center for Health Research, Kaiser Permanente Northwest, Portland, OR (GDC, JHT, AFP, DBN, MCL); AltaMed Health Services, Los Angeles, CA (MC, BY, AE, AC).
Brittany YoungerFrom Center for Health Research, Kaiser Permanente Northwest, Portland, OR (GDC, JHT, AFP, DBN, MCL); AltaMed Health Services, Los Angeles, CA (MC, BY, AE, AC).
Anne EscaronFrom Center for Health Research, Kaiser Permanente Northwest, Portland, OR (GDC, JHT, AFP, DBN, MCL); AltaMed Health Services, Los Angeles, CA (MC, BY, AE, AC).
Alex ChenFrom Center for Health Research, Kaiser Permanente Northwest, Portland, OR (GDC, JHT, AFP, DBN, MCL); AltaMed Health Services, Los Angeles, CA (MC, BY, AE, AC).
Kaiser Permanente Center for Health Research · US

Funding

Participatory Research to Advance Colon Cancer PreventionU01MD010665 · NIMHD · KAISER FOUNDATION RESEARCH INSTITUTE · PI CORONADO, GLORIA D · 2016 to 2020
$2.5M
NIMHD NIH HHS U01 MD010665
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundImproving uptake of colorectal cancer screening has the potential of saving thousands of lives. We compared the effectiveness of automated and live prompts and reminders as part of a mailed fecal immunochemical test (FIT) outreach program. DESIGN AND

methodsParticipants were 1767 adults aged 50 to 75 eyars who were not up-to-date with colorectal cancer screening recommendations at a participating community health center clinic. In addition to a mailed FIT kit, participants were randomized to receive (1) a text message prompt and 2 automated phone call reminders (automated condition); (2) up to 3 live call reminders (live condition); or (3) a text message prompt, 2 automated call reminders, and up to 3 live reminders (combined automated plus live condition). We assessed FIT completion rates in each group 6 months following randomization. KEY

resultsNearly one-third of participants completed an FIT within 6 months. Compared with adults allocated to the automated condition, FIT completion rates were higher in adults allocated to the live condition (32.3% vs 26.0%; adjusted difference, 6.3 percentage points; 95% CI, 1.1-11.4) and in adults allocated to the combined automated plus live condition (35.7% vs 26.0%; adjusted difference, 9.7 percentage points; 95% CI, 4.4-14.9). The number of kits needed to mail to achieve a completed FIT ranged from 2.8 in the combined automated plus live condition to 3.8 in the automated condition.

conclusionsAmong unscreened individuals in this population, live phone call reminders either alone or in combination with automated prompts and reminders outperformed automated approaches alone.

Indexed as

Reminder SystemsAgedColorectal NeoplasmsCommunity Health CentersEarly Detection of CancerFemaleHumansMaleMass ScreeningMiddle AgedOccult BloodPatient Acceptance of Health CarePatient ParticipationPilot ProjectsPostal ServiceTelephoneColon CancerColorectal CancerCommunity Health CentersEarly Detection of CancerHispanic AmericansOccult BloodText Messaging

Identifiers

PMID31068396
PMCPMC7331468
OpenAlexW2944680989

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.