Evidence map›Paper›PMID 31068184›Full record

SynthesisBMC health services research2019

Peer support interventions for individuals with acquired brain injury, cerebral palsy, and spina bifida: a systematic review.

Ben B Levy, Dorothy Luong, Laure Perrier, Mark T Bayley, Sarah E P Munce

Abstract readSystematic Review
In one paragraph

Synthesis in BMC health services research, 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 19 papers, 2 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
19citing papers in PubMed, 2 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

19 citing papers in PubMed, 2 syntheses or guidelines pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Review
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Review
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors.

Ben B LevyToronto Rehabilitation Institute - University Centre, 550 University Avenue, Toronto, Ontario, M5G 2A2, Canada.
Dorothy LuongToronto Rehabilitation Institute - Rumsey Centre, 345 Rumsey Road, Toronto, Ontario, M4G 1R7, Canada.
Laure PerrierUniversity of Toronto Libraries, 130 St. George Street, Toronto, Ontario, M5S 1A5, Canada.
Mark T BayleyToronto Rehabilitation Institute - University Centre, 550 University Avenue, Toronto, Ontario, M5G 2A2, Canada.
Sarah E P MunceToronto Rehabilitation Institute - Rumsey Centre, 345 Rumsey Road, Toronto, Ontario, M4G 1R7, Canada. sarah.munce@uhn.ca.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-0595-8395

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundNeurological disorders may negatively impact community integration and/or quality of life. Peer support has emerged as a potential strategy to enhance patients' efficacy in managing their own health. This review examines the key characteristics and impact of peer support interventions for adults with acquired brain injury, cerebral palsy, and spina bifida on community integration and quality of life.

methodsEligible studies reported on peer support interventions for adults (16 years of age or older) with acquired brain injury, cerebral palsy, or spina bifida. Only randomized controlled trials published in English in the last 10 years were included. MEDLINE, EMBASE, PsycINFO, and CINAHL were used to conduct the literature search. Two reviewers independently screened studies, abstracted data, and evaluated the risk of bias (for individual study elements and overall) using the Cochrane Risk of Bias Tool.

resultsThe systematic review included 6 trials reporting on acquired brain injury only. Of these studies, 4 reported on stroke and 2 reported on traumatic brain injury. Two studies found significant improvements in quality of life following peer support. No studies reported significant results on community integration. Considerable heterogeneity existed in the key characteristics of interventions.

conclusionsThere are a limited number of studies on the impact of peer support interventions for adults with acquired brain injury, cerebral palsy, or spina bifida on community integration and quality of life. Standardization of key intervention characteristics may aid the global adoption of peer support as a formalized, evidence-based practice.

Indexed as

MentoringPeer GroupBrain Injuries, TraumaticCerebral PalsyHumansQuality of LifeRandomized Controlled Trials as TopicSpinal DysraphismAcquired brain injuryCerebral palsyCommunity integrationPeer supportQuality of lifeSpina bifidaSystematic review

Identifiers

PMID31068184
PMCPMC6505073

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.