Evidence map›Paper›PMID 31068159›Full record

ArticleBMC medical education2019

Ward round competences in surgery and psychiatry - a comparative multidisciplinary interview study.

Elisa Vietz, Esther März, Christian Lottspeich, Teresa Wölfel, Martin R Fischer, Ralf Schmidmaier

Open access · goldAbstract readComparative Study
In one paragraph

Article in BMC medical education, 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 7 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
7citing papers in PubMed
1.6field-weighted citation impact, top 17% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

7 citing papers in PubMed, 12 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Review
  2. Review
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

Elisa VietzInstitut für Didaktik und Ausbildungsforschung in der Medizin, Klinikum der LMU München, Ziemssenstrasse 1, 80336, Munich, Germany. Elisa.Vietz@med.uni-muenchen.de.
Esther MärzInstitut für Didaktik und Ausbildungsforschung in der Medizin, Klinikum der LMU München, Ziemssenstrasse 1, 80336, Munich, Germany.
Christian LottspeichMedizinische Klinik und Poliklinik IV, Klinikum der Universität München (LMU), Ziemssenstrasse 1, 80336, Munich, Germany.
Teresa WölfelInstitut für Didaktik und Ausbildungsforschung in der Medizin, Klinikum der LMU München, Ziemssenstrasse 1, 80336, Munich, Germany.
Martin R FischerInstitut für Didaktik und Ausbildungsforschung in der Medizin, Klinikum der LMU München, Ziemssenstrasse 1, 80336, Munich, Germany.
Ralf SchmidmaierInstitut für Didaktik und Ausbildungsforschung in der Medizin, Klinikum der LMU München, Ziemssenstrasse 1, 80336, Munich, Germany.
LMU Klinikum · DELudwig-Maximilians-Universität München · DE

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundThe ward round is a key element in everyday hospital inpatient care irrespective of the medical speciality. The underperformance in conducting ward rounds of junior clinicians has already been described. Therefore, necessary skills and competences of clinicians need to be defined, taught and delivered for curricular instruction. In addition to published data on ward round competences in internal medicine this study aims to determine the common competences for surgical and psychiatric ward rounds in order to find differences depending on the speciality.

methodsSemi-structured interviews with surgical (N = 30) and psychiatric ward staff (N = 30) of a university hospital and five community hospitals were conducted. Competences necessary for performing ward rounds as well as structural aspects were identified by systematic content analysis and frequency analysis, supported by adequate statistics.

resultsRelevant competences for both fields are: collaborative clinical reasoning, communication with the patient and the team, organization, teamwork, management of difficult situations, self-management, error-management, teaching, empathy, nonverbal communication, patient-management and professionalism. Clinical skills were mentioned more often in surgical interviews, while nonverbal communication was described more often in psychiatric interviews. Empathy and communication with the team were more frequently attributed to psychiatric residents.

conclusionThe competences which were identified as necessary for conducting a ward round in surgery and psychiatry are similar and correspond to previously reported competences in internal medicine. Clinical skills are of greater importance in surgery than in psychiatry. Concerning empathy and nonverbal communication, further research is needed to determine whether they are of minor importance in surgery or whether there is a lack of awareness of these competences.

Indexed as

General SurgeryPsychiatryTeaching RoundsAttitude of Health PersonnelClinical CompetenceCommunicationEmpathyEvaluation Studies as TopicHumansInterdisciplinary StudiesInternal MedicineInterprofessional RelationsInterviews as TopicMedical Staff, HospitalPhysician-Nurse RelationsPhysician-Patient RelationsComparison surgery psychiatryCompetencesEntrustable professional activityPsychiatric ward roundSurgical ward round

Identifiers

PMID31068159
PMCPMC6506958
OpenAlexW2947190076

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.