Evidence map›Paper›PMID 31068139›Full record

SynthesisBMC anesthesiology2019

Reliability of pleth variability index in predicting preload responsiveness of mechanically ventilated patients under various conditions: a systematic review and meta-analysis.

Tianyu Liu, Chao Xu, Min Wang, Zheng Niu, Dunyi Qi

3 registry-linked trialsAbstract readMeta-AnalysisSystematic Review
In one paragraph

Synthesis in BMC anesthesiology, 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to 3 registered trials, which are not on this map. Cited by 22 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
22citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

NCT04373213 unknown statusnot on this mapstarted 2020, after this paper: background citation

Evaluation of the Fluid Response of SARS-CoV-2 (COVID-19) Patients in Intensive Care; Pleth Variability Index

TypeobservationalSponsorErzincan UniversityRan2020 to 2020Enrolled30ConditionsPleth Variability IndexArmsPleth variability index
NCT04664699 nacompletednot on this map

Comparison of Standard Monitoring and Plethysmographic Variability Index-Guided Fluid Therapy In Severe Traumatic Brain Injury Patients Scheduled for Emergency Craniotomies: A Randomised Control Trial

TypeinterventionalSponsorUniversiti Sains MalaysiaRan2019 to 2020Enrolled64ConditionsSevere Traumatic Brain InjuryArmsPlethymographic Variability Index, Standard Monitoring
NCT05428423 unknown statusnot on this mapstarted 2022, after this paper: background citation

Assessment of the Reliability of Changes in Plethysmography Variability Index During Tidal Volume Challenge for Predicting Fluid Responsiveness in Intensive Care Unit Patients

TypeobservationalSponsorBicetre HospitalRan2022 to 2022Enrolled44ConditionsShock, Septic Shock, Sepsis, Hemodynamic Instability
3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

22 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Trial
  2. Trial
  3. Article
  4. Pulse Oximetry-A Perioperative Perspective.Diagnostics (Basel, Switzerland) · 2026
    Review
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. End-tidal COPakistan journal of medical sciences · 2025
    Article
  8. Observational
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Observational
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Review
  19. Observational
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors.

Tianyu LiuKey Laboratory of Anesthesia and Analgesia, Xuzhou Medical University, Xuzhou, Jangsu, China.
Chao XuKey Laboratory of Anesthesia and Analgesia, Xuzhou Medical University, Xuzhou, Jangsu, China.
Min WangKey Laboratory of Anesthesia and Analgesia, Xuzhou Medical University, Xuzhou, Jangsu, China.
Zheng NiuKey Laboratory of Anesthesia and Analgesia, Xuzhou Medical University, Xuzhou, Jangsu, China.
Dunyi QiKey Laboratory of Anesthesia and Analgesia, Xuzhou Medical University, Xuzhou, Jangsu, China. qdy6808@163.com.ORCID 0000-0002-0432-5422

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundGoal-directed volume expansion is increasingly used for fluid management in mechanically ventilated patients. The Pleth Variability Index (PVI) has been shown to reliably predict preload responsiveness; however, a lot of research on PVI has been published recently, and update of the meta-analysis needs to be completed.

methodsWe searched PUBMED, EMBASE, Cochrane Library, Web of Science (updated to November 7, 2018) and the associated references. Relevant authors and researchers had been contacted for complete data.

resultsTwenty-five studies with 975 mechanically ventilated patients were included in this meta-analysis. The area under the curve (AUC) of receiver operating characteristics (ROC) to predict preload responsiveness was 0.82 (95% confidence interval (CI) 0.79-0.85). The pooled sensitivity was 0.77 (95% CI 0.67-0.85) and the pooled specificity was 0.77 (95% CI 0.71-0.82). The results of subgroup of patients without undergoing surgery (AUC =0.86, Youden index =0.65) and the results of subgroup of patients in ICU (AUC =0.89, Youden index =0.67) were reliable.

conclusionThe reliability of the PVI is limited, but the PVI can play an important role in bedside monitoring for mechanically ventilated patients who are not undergoing surgery. Patients who are expanded with colloid may be more suitable for PVI.

Indexed as

Clinical Trials as TopicHemodynamicsHumansMonitoring, IntraoperativeOximetryPredictive Value of TestsReproducibility of ResultsRespiration, ArtificialMechanically ventilated patientsMeta-analysisPleth variability indexPreload responsiveness

Identifiers

PMID31068139
PMCPMC6507157

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.