Evidence map›Paper›PMID 31067962›Full record

ArticleThe Journal of the Acoustical Society of America2019

Age effects on the contributions of envelope and periodicity cues to recognition of interrupted speech in quiet and with a competing talker.

William J Bologna, Kenneth I Vaden, Jayne B Ahlstrom, Judy R Dubno

Abstract read
PubMed Full text at PMC Publisher
In one paragraph

Article in The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America, 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
3citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

3 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors.

William J BolognaDepartment of Otolaryngology-Head and Neck Surgery, Medical University of South Carolina, 135 Rutledge Avenue, MSC 550, Charleston, South Carolina 29425-5500, USAWilliam.bologna@va.gov, vaden@musc.edu, ahlstrjb@musc.edu, dubnojr@musc.edu.
Kenneth I VadenDepartment of Otolaryngology-Head and Neck Surgery, Medical University of South Carolina, 135 Rutledge Avenue, MSC 550, Charleston, South Carolina 29425-5500, USAWilliam.bologna@va.gov, vaden@musc.edu, ahlstrjb@musc.edu, dubnojr@musc.edu.
Jayne B AhlstromDepartment of Otolaryngology-Head and Neck Surgery, Medical University of South Carolina, 135 Rutledge Avenue, MSC 550, Charleston, South Carolina 29425-5500, USAWilliam.bologna@va.gov, vaden@musc.edu, ahlstrjb@musc.edu, dubnojr@musc.edu.
Judy R DubnoDepartment of Otolaryngology-Head and Neck Surgery, Medical University of South Carolina, 135 Rutledge Avenue, MSC 550, Charleston, South Carolina 29425-5500, USAWilliam.bologna@va.gov, vaden@musc.edu, ahlstrjb@musc.edu, dubnojr@musc.edu.

Funding

SPEECH UNDERSTANDING IN REALISTIC ENVIRONMENTSP50DC000422 · NIDCD · MEDICAL UNIVERSITY OF SOUTH CAROLINA · PI DUBNO, JUDY R · 1989 to 2025
$45.3M
South Carolina Clinical & Translational Research Institute (SCTR)UL1TR000062 · NCATS · MEDICAL UNIVERSITY OF SOUTH CAROLINA · PI BRADY, KATHLEEN T. · 2012 to 2014
$9.4M
AUDITORY ANALYSIS AND SPEECH RECOGNITIONR01DC000184 · NIDCD · UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA LOS ANGELES · PI DUBNO, JUDY R · 1989 to 2016
$5.1M
RENOVATION TO SUPPORT SENSORY NEUROSCIENCE RESEARCHC06RR014516 · NCRR · MEDICAL UNIVERSITY OF SOUTH CAROLINA · PI RAYMOND, JOHN R · 1999 to 1999
–
NCATS NIH HHS UL1 TR000062NCRR NIH HHS C06 RR014516NIDCD NIH HHS P50 DC000422NIDCD NIH HHS R01 DC000184
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Envelope and periodicity cues may provide redundant, additive, or synergistic benefits to speech recognition. The contributions of these cues may change under different listening conditions and may differ for younger and older adults. To address these questions, younger and older adults with normal hearing listened to interrupted sentences containing different combinations of envelope and periodicity cues in quiet and with a competing talker. Envelope and periodicity cues improved speech recognition for both groups, and their benefits were additive when both cues were available. Envelope cues were particularly important for older adults and for sentences with a competing talker.

Indexed as

CuesSpeech PerceptionAdolescentAdultAgedAged, 80 and overAgingFemaleHumansMaleMiddle AgedPeriodicitySignal-To-Noise Ratio

Identifiers

PMID31067962
PMCPMC7112707

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.