Evidence map›Paper›PMID 31067936›Full record

ArticleThe Journal of the Acoustical Society of America2019

A deep learning algorithm to increase intelligibility for hearing-impaired listeners in the presence of a competing talker and reverberation.

Eric W Healy, Masood Delfarah, Eric M Johnson, DeLiang Wang

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America, 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 18 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
18citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

18 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Trial
  2. Acoustic Scene-Aware Processing and Auditory Model-Based Compensation Strategies.Journal of the Association for Research in Otolaryngology : JARO · 2026
    Review
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Progress made in the efficacy and viability of deep-learning-based noise reduction.The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America · 2023
    Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Harnessing the Power of Artificial Intelligence in Otolaryngology and the Communication Sciences.Journal of the Association for Research in Otolaryngology : JARO · 2022
    Review
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors.

Eric W HealyDepartment of Speech and Hearing Science, and Center for Cognitive and Brain Sciences, The Ohio State University, Columbus, Ohio 43210, USA.
Masood DelfarahDepartment of Computer Science and Engineering, The Ohio State University, Columbus, Ohio 43210, USA.
Eric M JohnsonDepartment of Speech and Hearing Science, and Center for Cognitive and Brain Sciences, The Ohio State University, Columbus, Ohio 43210, USA.
DeLiang WangDepartment of Computer Science and Engineering, and Center for Cognitive and Brain Sciences, The Ohio State University, Columbus, Ohio 43210, USA.

Funding

Speech segregation to improve intelligility of reverberant-noisy speechR01DC012048 · NIDCD · OHIO STATE UNIVERSITY · PI WILLIAMSON, DONALD · 2013 to 2022
$3.3M
Improving intelligibility in noise for hearing-impaired listenersR01DC015521 · NIDCD · OHIO STATE UNIVERSITY · PI HEALY, ERIC W · 2016 to 2020
$1.6M
NIDCD NIH HHS R01 DC012048NIDCD NIH HHS R01 DC015521
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

For deep learning based speech segregation to have translational significance as a noise-reduction tool, it must perform in a wide variety of acoustic environments. In the current study, performance was examined when target speech was subjected to interference from a single talker and room reverberation. Conditions were compared in which an algorithm was trained to remove both reverberation and interfering speech, or only interfering speech. A recurrent neural network incorporating bidirectional long short-term memory was trained to estimate the ideal ratio mask corresponding to target speech. Substantial intelligibility improvements were found for hearing-impaired (HI) and normal-hearing (NH) listeners across a range of target-to-interferer ratios (TIRs). HI listeners performed better with reverberation removed, whereas NH listeners demonstrated no difference. Algorithm benefit averaged 56 percentage points for the HI listeners at the least-favorable TIR, allowing these listeners to perform numerically better than young NH listeners without processing. The current study highlights the difficulty associated with perceiving speech in reverberant-noisy environments, and it extends the range of environments in which deep learning based speech segregation can be effectively applied. This increasingly wide array of environments includes not only a variety of background noises and interfering speech, but also room reverberation.

Indexed as

Deep LearningSpeech IntelligibilitySpeech Recognition SoftwareAgedFemaleHearing AidsHearing Loss, SensorineuralHumansMaleMiddle AgedSignal-To-Noise RatioSpeech Perception

Identifiers

PMID31067936
PMCPMC6420339

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.