Evidence map›Paper›PMID 31067801›Full record

ArticleBioengineering (Basel, Switzerland)2019

Compressive Mechanical Properties of Porcine Brain: Experimentation and Modeling of the Tissue Hydration Effects.

Raj K Prabhu, Mark T Begonia, Wilburn R Whittington, Michael A Murphy, Yuxiong Mao, Jun Liao, Lakiesha N Williams, Mark F Horstemeyer, Jianping Sheng

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Bioengineering (Basel, Switzerland), 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
4citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

4 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Needle-induced cavitation: A method to probe the local mechanics of brain tissue.Journal of the mechanical behavior of biomedical materials · 2024
    Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Introduction to the Special Issue onBioengineering (Basel, Switzerland) · 2020
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

9 authors.

Raj K PrabhuCenter for Advanced Vehicular Systems, Mississippi State University, Mississippi State, MS 39795, USA. rprabhu@abe.msstate.edu.
Mark T BegoniaCenter for Advanced Vehicular Systems, Mississippi State University, Mississippi State, MS 39795, USA. mbegonia@vt.edu.
Wilburn R WhittingtonCenter for Advanced Vehicular Systems, Mississippi State University, Mississippi State, MS 39795, USA. whittington@me.msstate.edu.
Michael A MurphyCenter for Advanced Vehicular Systems, Mississippi State University, Mississippi State, MS 39795, USA. mam526@cavs.msstate.edu.
Yuxiong MaoCenter for Advanced Vehicular Systems, Mississippi State University, Mississippi State, MS 39795, USA. maxmcn@gmail.com.
Jun LiaoDepartment of Bioengineering, University of Texas Arlington, Arlington, TX 76010, USA. jun.liao@uta.edu.
Lakiesha N WilliamsJ. Crayton Pruitt Family Department of Biomedical Engineering, University of Florida, Gainesville, FL 32611, USA. lwilliams@bme.ufl.edu.
Mark F HorstemeyerSchool of Engineering, Liberty University, Lynchburg, VA 24515, USA. mhorstemeyer@liberty.edu.
Jianping ShengU.S. Army Tank Automotive Research, Development, and Engineering Center (TARDEC), Warren, MI 48397, USA. jianping.sheng.civ@mail.mil.

Funding

National Nuclear Security Administration DE-FC26-06NT42755U.S. Army TACOM Life Cycle Command W56HZV-08-C-0236
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Designing protective systems for the human head-and, hence, the brain-requires understanding the brain's microstructural response to mechanical insults. We present the behavior of wet and dry porcine brain undergoing quasi-static and high strain rate mechanical deformations to unravel the effect of hydration on the brain's biomechanics. Here, native 'wet' brain samples contained ~80% (mass/mass) water content and 'dry' brain samples contained ~0% (mass/mass) water content. First, the wet brain incurred a large initial peak stress that was not exhibited by the dry brain. Second, stress levels for the dry brain were greater than the wet brain. Third, the dry brain stress-strain behavior was characteristic of ductile materials with a yield point and work hardening; however, the wet brain showed a typical concave inflection that is often manifested by polymers. Finally, finite element analysis (FEA) of the brain's high strain rate response for samples with various proportions of water and dry brain showed that water played a major role in the initial hardening trend. Therefore, hydration level plays a key role in brain tissue micromechanics, and the incorporation of this hydration effect on the brain's mechanical response in simulated injury scenarios or virtual human-centric protective headgear design is essential.

Indexed as

porcine brain, mechanical behavior, hydration effects, Split-Hopkinson pressure bar, micromechanics, finite element analysis

Identifiers

PMID31067801
PMCPMC6631105

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.