Evidence map›Paper›PMID 31067749›Full record

ArticleNanomaterials (Basel, Switzerland)2019

Targeted Gold Nanoparticle⁻Oligonucleotide Contrast Agents in Combination with a New Local Voxel-Wise MRI Analysis Algorithm for In Vitro Imaging of Triple-Negative Breast Cancer.

Rajat Chauhan, Nagwa El-Baz, Robert S Keynton, Kurtis T James, Danial A Malik, Mingming Zhu, Ayman El-Baz, Chin K Ng, Paula J Bates, Mohammad Tariq Malik and 1 more

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Nanomaterials (Basel, Switzerland), 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 9 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
9citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

9 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. A target-activated AS1411 aptamer probe forFrontiers in bioengineering and biotechnology · 2026
    Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Review
  7. Review
  8. Review
  9. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

11 authors.

Rajat ChauhanDepartment of Bioengineering, University of Louisville, Louisville, KY 40292, USA. rajat.rajat@louisville.edu.
Nagwa El-BazDepartment of Pharmacology and Toxicology, University of Louisville, Louisville, KY 40202, USA. nagwa.el-baz@louisville.edu.
Robert S KeyntonDepartment of Bioengineering, University of Louisville, Louisville, KY 40292, USA. robert.keynton@louisville.edu.ORCID 0000-0001-5581-0500
Kurtis T JamesDepartment of Bioengineering, University of Louisville, Louisville, KY 40292, USA. Kurtis.james@louisville.edu.
Danial A MalikDepartment of Pharmacology and Toxicology, University of Louisville, Louisville, KY 40202, USA. danial.malik@louisville.edu.
Mingming ZhuDepartment of Radiology, University of Louisville, Louisville, KY 40202, USA. mingming.zhu@louisville.edu.
Ayman El-BazDepartment of Bioengineering, University of Louisville, Louisville, KY 40292, USA. ayman.elbaz@louisville.edu.
Chin K NgDepartment of Radiology, University of Louisville, Louisville, KY 40202, USA. chin.ng@louisville.edu.
Paula J BatesDepartment of Medicine and James Graham Brown Cancer Center, University of Louisville, Louisville, KY 40202, USA. paula.bates@louisville.edu.
Mohammad Tariq MalikDepartment of Medicine and James Graham Brown Cancer Center, University of Louisville, Louisville, KY 40202, USA. tariq.malik@louisville.edu.
Martin G O'TooleDepartment of Bioengineering, University of Louisville, Louisville, KY 40292, USA. martin.otoole@louisville.edu.ORCID 0000-0001-9191-6601

Funding

National Institutes of Health U01HL127518
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Gold nanoparticles (GNPs) have tremendous potential as cancer-targeted contrast agents for diagnostic imaging. The ability to modify the particle surface with both disease-targeting molecules (such as the cancer-specific aptamer AS1411) and contrast agents (such as the gadolinium chelate Gd(III)-DO3A-SH) enables tailoring the particles for specific cancer-imaging and diagnosis. While the amount of image contrast generated by nanoparticle contrast agents is often low, it can be augmented with the assistance of computer image analysis algorithms. In this work, the ability of cancer-targeted gold nanoparticle-oligonucleotide conjugates to distinguish between malignant (MDA-MB-231) and healthy cells (MCF-10A) is tested using a T1-weighted image analysis algorithm based on three-dimensional, deformable model-based segmentation to extract the Volume of Interest (VOI). The gold nanoparticle/algorithm tandem was tested using contrast agent GNP-Gd(III)-DO3A-SH-AS1411) and nontargeted c-rich oligonucleotide (CRO) analogs and control (CTR) counterparts (GNP-Gd(III)-DO3A-SH-CRO/CTR) via in vitro studies. Remarkably, the cancer cells were notably distinguished from the nonmalignant cells, especially at nanomolar contrast agent concentrations. The T1-weighted image analysis algorithm provided similar results to the industry standard Varian software interface (VNMRJ) analysis of T1 maps at micromolar contrast agent concentrations, in which the VNMRJ produced a 19.5% better MRI contrast enhancement. However, our algorithm provided more sensitive and consistent results at nanomolar contrast agent concentrations, where our algorithm produced ~500% better MRI contrast enhancement.

Indexed as

AS1411gadolinium based contrast agentgold nanoparticlesG-quadruplexMRI local voxel-wise analysis

Identifiers

PMID31067749
PMCPMC6566234

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.