Evidence map›Paper›PMID 31067693›Full record

ArticleInternational journal of environmental research and public health2019

Microbiological Safety of Non-Food Products: What Can We Learn from the RAPEX Database?

Szilvia Vincze, Sascha Al Dahouk, Ralf Dieckmann

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in International journal of environmental research and public health, 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
2citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

2 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors.

Szilvia VinczeDepartment of Biological Safety, German Federal Institute for Risk Assessment, 10589 Berlin, Germany. szilvia.vincze@bfr.bund.de.
Sascha Al DahoukDepartment of Biological Safety, German Federal Institute for Risk Assessment, 10589 Berlin, Germany. Sascha.Al-Dahouk@gmx.de.ORCID 0000-0003-3835-0818
Ralf DieckmannDepartment of Biological Safety, German Federal Institute for Risk Assessment, 10589 Berlin, Germany. ralf.dieckmann@bfr.bund.de.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

For consumer protection across borders, the European Union has established the rapid alert system for dangerous non-food products (RAPEX), with the overarching goal of preventing or limiting the sale and use of non-food products that present a serious risk for the health and safety of consumers. In our study, we comprehensively analyzed RAPEX notifications associated with products posing a microbiological risk from 2005 through 2017. Additional information was retrieved from national laboratory reports. A total of 243 microbiologically harmful consumer products triggered notifications in 23 out of 31 participating countries. About half of the products were reported by Spain, Germany, and Italy. Notifications mainly included contaminated toys, cosmetics, and chemical products. Depending on the notifying country, measures taken to prevent the spread of dangerous products were predominantly ordered either by public authorities or economic operators. The interval between microbiological diagnosis and the date of RAPEX notifications considerably varied between RAPEX member states, ranging between a few days and 82 weeks. The nature and extent of RAPEX usage substantially differed among member states, calling for harmonization and optimization. Slight modifications to RAPEX could help to systematically record microbiological hazards, which may improve the assessment of potential health risks due to contaminated non-food products.

Indexed as

Consumer Product SafetyDatabases, FactualEnvironmental MicrobiologyCosmeticsEuropean UnionPlay and PlaythingsCosmeticsmicrobial contaminationnon-food productsRAPEXrapid alert system of dangerous non-food products

Identifiers

PMID31067693
PMCPMC6538994

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.