Evidence map›Paper›PMID 31067679›Full record

ArticleInternational journal of environmental research and public health2019

Estimated Impact of Targeted Pre-Exposure Prophylaxis: Strategies for Men Who Have Sex with Men in the United States.

Richard A Elion, Mina Kabiri, Kenneth H Mayer, David A Wohl, Joshua Cohen, Anne C Beaubrun, Frederick L Altice

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in International journal of environmental research and public health, 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 9 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
9citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

9 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Qualitative Examination of the Impact of the COVID-19 Pandemic on Access and Adherence to Pre-exposure Prophylaxis (PrEP) Among Sexual and Gender Minorities.AIDS education and prevention : official publication of the International Society for AIDS Education · 2023
    Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors.

Richard A ElionGeorge Washington University School of Medicine, Washington, DC 20009, USA. rickelion@gmail.com.
Mina KabiriPrecision Health Economics, Los Angeles, CA 90025, USA. mina.kabiri@pheconomics.com.ORCID 0000-0002-3486-7652
Kenneth H MayerThe Fenway Institute, Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA 02215, USA. kmayer@fenwayhealth.org.ORCID 0000-0001-7460-733X
David A WohlChapel Hill School of Medicine, The University of North Carolina, Chapel Hill, NC 27514, USA. david_wohl@med.unc.edu.
Joshua CohenTufts University Institute for Clinical Research and Health Policy Studies, Tufts Medical Center, Boston, MA 02111, USA. joshua.cohen@tufts.edu.
Anne C BeaubrunGilead Sciences, Foster City, CA 94404, USA. anne.beaubrun@gilead.com.
Frederick L AlticeSection of Infectious Diseases, Yale University School of Medicine, New Haven, CT 06510, USA. frederick.altice@yale.edu.

Funding

Yale Clinical and Translational Science Award (U Component)UL1TR001863 · NCATS · YALE UNIVERSITY · PI John H. Krystal, LUCILA OHNO-MACHADO · 2016 to 2026
$102.9M
NCATS NIH HHS UL1 TR001863
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Pre-exposure prophylaxis (PrEP) effectively reduces human immunodeficiency virus (HIV) transmission. We aimed to estimate the impact of different PrEP prioritization strategies among Black and Latino men who have sex with men (MSM) in the United States, populations most disproportionately affected by HIV. We developed an agent-based simulation to model the HIV epidemic among MSM. Individuals were assigned an HIV incidence risk index (HIRI-MSM) based on their sexual behavior. Prioritization strategies included PrEP use for individuals with HIRI-MSM ≥10 among all MSM, all Black MSM, young (≤25 years) Black MSM, Latino MSM, and young Latino MSM. We estimated the number needed to treat (NNT) to prevent one HIV infection, reductions in prevalence and incidence, and subsequent infections in non-PrEP users avoided under these strategies over 5 years (2016-2020). Young Black MSM eligible for PrEP had the lowest NNT (NNT = 10) followed by all Black MSM (NNT = 33) and young Latino MSM (NNT = 35). All Latino MSM and all MSM had NNT values of 63 and 70, respectively. Secondary infection reduction with PrEP was the highest among young Latino MSM (53.2%) followed by young Black MSM (37.8%). Targeting all MSM had the greatest reduction in prevalence (14.7% versus 2.9%-3.9% in other strategies) and incidence (49.4% versus 9.4%-13.9% in other groups). Using data representative of the United States MSM population, we found that a strategy of universal PrEP use by MSM was most effective in reducing HIV prevalence and incidence of MSM. Targeted use of PrEP by Black and Latino MSM, however, especially those ≤25 years, had the greatest impact on HIV prevention.

Indexed as

Pre-Exposure ProphylaxisSexual and Gender MinoritiesAdolescentAdultBlack or African AmericanHispanic or LatinoHIV InfectionsHomosexuality, MaleHumansMaleMiddle AgedSafe SexUnited StatesYoung Adultagent-based modelhuman immunodeficiency virus (HIV)men who have sex with men (MSM)number needed to treatpre-exposure prophylaxis (PrEP)simulation

Identifiers

PMID31067679
PMCPMC6539923

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.