ReviewAntibiotics (Basel, Switzerland)2019
Current Issues and Perspectives in Patients with Possible Sepsis at Emergency Departments.
Review in Antibiotics (Basel, Switzerland), 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 14 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
14 citing papers in PubMed, 30 citations in OpenAlex.
- Foodborne antimicrobial resistance risks in traditional markets in West Sumatra: a one health investigation ofOpen veterinary journal · 2026Article
- Fluid Resuscitation and Initial Management in Patients Presenting with Sepsis in the General Ward.Life (Basel, Switzerland) · 2025Article
- Biomolecular Actions by Intestinal Endotoxemia in Metabolic Syndrome.International journal of molecular sciences · 2024Review
- Might Gut Microbiota Be a Target for a Personalized Therapeutic Approach in Patients Affected by Atherosclerosis Disease?Journal of personalized medicine · 2023Review
- About Functional Foods: The Probiotics and Prebiotics State of Art.Antibiotics (Basel, Switzerland) · 2023Review
- Non-Surgical Therapy and Oral Microbiota Features in Peri-Implant Complications: A Brief Narrative Review.Healthcare (Basel, Switzerland) · 2023Review
- Article
- Review
- Cardiac Involvement in COVID-19 Patients: A Contemporary Review.Infectious disease reports · 2021Review
- The human coronaviruses (HCoVs) and the molecular mechanisms of SARS-CoV-2 infection.Journal of molecular medicine (Berlin, Germany) · 2021Review
- Impact of Blood Type O on Mortality of Sepsis Patients: A Multicenter Retrospective Observational Study.Diagnostics (Basel, Switzerland) · 2020Article
- Special features of SARS-CoV-2 in daily practice.World journal of clinical cases · 2020Review
- Sepsis and Nosocomial Infections: The Role of Medico-Legal Experts in Italy.Antibiotics (Basel, Switzerland) · 2019Review
- The Preoperative Inflammatory Status Affects the Clinical Outcome in Cardiac Surgery.Antibiotics (Basel, Switzerland) · 2019Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors at 4 institutions in 2 countries.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
In the area of Emergency Room (ER), many patients present criteria compatible with a SIRS, but only some of them have an associated infection. The new definition of sepsis by the European Society of Intensive Care Medicine and the Society of Critical Care Medicine (2016), revolutionizes precedent criteria, overcoming the concept of SIRS and clearly distinguishing the infection with the patient's physiological response from the symptoms of sepsis. Another fundamental change concerns the recognition method: The use of SOFA (Sequential-Sepsis Related-Organ Failure Assessment Score) as reference score for organ damage assessment. Also, the use of the qSOFA is based on the use of three objective parameters: Altered level of consciousness (GCS <15 or AVPU), systolic blood pressure ≤ 100 mmHg, and respiratory rate ≥ 22/min. If patients have at least two of these altered parameters in association with an infection, then there is the suspicion of sepsis. In these patients the risk of death is higher, and it is necessary to implement the appropriate management protocols, indeed the hospital mortality rate of these patients exceeds 40%. Patients with septic shock can be identified by the association of the clinical symptoms of sepsis with persistent hypotension, which requires vasopressors to maintain a MAP of 65 mmHg, and serum lactate levels >18 mg/dL in despite of an adequate volume resuscitation. Then, patient first management is mainly based on: (1) Recognition of the potentially septic patient (sepsis protocol-qSOFA); (2) Laboratory investigations; (3) Empirical antibiotic therapy in patients with sepsis and septic shock. With this in mind, the authors discuss the most important aspects of the sepsis in both adults and infants, and also consider the possible treatment according current guidelines. In addition, the possible role of some nutraceuticals as supportive therapy in septic patient is also discussed.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.