Evidence map›Paper›PMID 31067577›Full record

ArticleApplied clinical informatics2019

Development and Prospective Validation of a Machine Learning-Based Risk of Readmission Model in a Large Military Hospital.

Carly Eckert, Neris Nieves-Robbins, Elena Spieker, Tom Louwers, David Hazel, James Marquardt, Keith Solveson, Anam Zahid, Muhammad Ahmad, Richard Barnhill and 4 more

Open access · bronzeAbstract readValidation Study
In one paragraph

Article in Applied clinical informatics, 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 9 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
9citing papers in PubMed
3.3field-weighted citation impact, top 8% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

9 citing papers in PubMed, 19 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Current Trends in Readmission Prediction: An Overview of Approaches.Arabian journal for science and engineering · 2021
    Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

14 authors at 3 institutions in 1 country.

Carly EckertKenSci Inc., Seattle, Washington, United States.
Neris Nieves-RobbinsOffice of the U.S. Army Surgeon General, Defense Health Headquarters (Health Information Technology/CMIO Office), Falls Church, Virginia, United States.
Elena SpiekerClinical Informatics Division, Madigan Army Medical Center, Joint Base Lewis-McChord, Tacoma, Washington, United States.
Tom LouwersKenSci Inc., Seattle, Washington, United States.
David HazelKenSci Inc., Seattle, Washington, United States.
James MarquardtKenSci Inc., Seattle, Washington, United States.
Keith SolvesonClinical Informatics Division, Madigan Army Medical Center, Joint Base Lewis-McChord, Tacoma, Washington, United States.
Anam ZahidKenSci Inc., Seattle, Washington, United States.
Muhammad AhmadKenSci Inc., Seattle, Washington, United States.
Richard BarnhillClinical Informatics Division, Madigan Army Medical Center, Joint Base Lewis-McChord, Tacoma, Washington, United States.
T Greg McKelveyKenSci Inc., Seattle, Washington, United States.
Robert MarshallClinical Informatics Division, Madigan Army Medical Center, Joint Base Lewis-McChord, Tacoma, Washington, United States.
Eric ShryClinical Informatics Division, Madigan Army Medical Center, Joint Base Lewis-McChord, Tacoma, Washington, United States.
Ankur TeredesaiKenSci Inc., Seattle, Washington, United States.
Behavioral Tech Research, Inc. · USMadigan Army Medical Center · USUnited States Army Medical Command · US

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundThirty-day hospital readmissions are a quality metric for health care systems. Predictive models aim to identify patients likely to readmit to more effectively target preventive strategies. Many risk of readmission models have been developed on retrospective data, but prospective validation of readmission models is rare. To the best of our knowledge, none of these developed models have been evaluated or prospectively validated in a military hospital.

objectivesThe objectives of this study are to demonstrate the development and prospective validation of machine learning (ML) risk of readmission models to be utilized by clinical staff at a military medical facility and demonstrate the collaboration between the U.S. Department of Defense's integrated health care system and a private company.

methodsWe evaluated multiple ML algorithms to develop a predictive model for 30-day readmissions using data from a retrospective cohort of all-cause inpatient readmissions at Madigan Army Medical Center (MAMC). This predictive model was then validated on prospective MAMC patient data. Precision, recall, accuracy, and the area under the receiver operating characteristic curve (AUC) were used to evaluate model performance. The model was revised, retrained, and rescored on additional retrospective MAMC data after the prospective model's initial performance was evaluated.

resultsWithin the initial retrospective cohort, which included 32,659 patient encounters, the model achieved an AUC of 0.68. During prospective scoring, 1,574 patients were scored, of whom 152 were readmitted within 30 days of discharge, with an all-cause readmission rate of 9.7%. The AUC of the prospective predictive model was 0.64. The model achieved an AUC of 0.76 after revision and addition of further retrospective data.

conclusionThis work reflects significant collaborative efforts required to operationalize ML models in a complex clinical environment such as that seen in an integrated health care system and the importance of prospective model validation.

Indexed as

Hospitals, MilitaryMachine LearningPatient ReadmissionAlgorithmsHumansModels, TheoreticalProspective StudiesRetrospective StudiesSoftware

Identifiers

PMID31067577
PMCPMC6506330
OpenAlexW2944632687

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.