Evidence map›Paper›PMID 31067455›Full record

ArticleCell reports2019

High Dietary Sugar Reshapes Sweet Taste to Promote Feeding Behavior in Drosophila melanogaster.

Christina E May, Anoumid Vaziri, Yong Qi Lin, Olga Grushko, Morteza Khabiri, Qiao-Ping Wang, Kristina J Holme, Scott D Pletcher, Lydia Freddolino, G Gregory Neely and 1 more

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Cell reports, 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 69 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
69citing papers in PubMed
8.0field-weighted citation impact, top 1% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

69 citing papers in PubMed, 148 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Review
  3. Article
  4. Review
  5. Review
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Review
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. eLife · 2024
    Article
  15. bioRxiv : the preprint server for biology · 2024
    Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article

9 more citing papers are in PubMed but not listed here.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

11 authors at 2 institutions in 3 countries.

Christina E MayNeuroscience Graduate Program, The University of Michigan, Ann Arbor, MI 48109, USA.
Anoumid VaziriMolecular, Cellular, and Developmental Biology Graduate Program, The University of Michigan, Ann Arbor, MI 48109, USA.
Yong Qi LinThe Dr. John and Anne Chong Lab for Functional Genomics, Charles Perkins Centre and School of Life and Environmental Sciences, The University of Sydney, Sydney, NSW 2006, Australia.
Olga GrushkoDepartment of Molecular, Cellular, and Developmental Biology, The University of Michigan, Ann Arbor, MI 48109, USA.
Morteza KhabiriDepartment of Biological Chemistry, The University of Michigan, Ann Arbor, MI 48109, USA.
Qiao-Ping WangThe Dr. John and Anne Chong Lab for Functional Genomics, Charles Perkins Centre and School of Life and Environmental Sciences, The University of Sydney, Sydney, NSW 2006, Australia; School of Pharmaceutical Sciences (Shenzhen), Sun Yat-sen University, Guangzhou, 510275, PR China.
Kristina J HolmePhysiology Graduate Program, Department of Molecular & Integrative Physiology, The University of Michigan Medical School, Ann Arbor, MI 48109, USA.
Scott D PletcherPhysiology Graduate Program, Department of Molecular & Integrative Physiology, The University of Michigan Medical School, Ann Arbor, MI 48109, USA.
Lydia FreddolinoDepartment of Biological Chemistry, The University of Michigan, Ann Arbor, MI 48109, USA; Department of Computational Medicine and Bioinformatics, The University of Michigan, Ann Arbor, MI 48109, USA.
G Gregory NeelyThe Dr. John and Anne Chong Lab for Functional Genomics, Charles Perkins Centre and School of Life and Environmental Sciences, The University of Sydney, Sydney, NSW 2006, Australia.
Monica DusNeuroscience Graduate Program, The University of Michigan, Ann Arbor, MI 48109, USA; Molecular, Cellular, and Developmental Biology Graduate Program, The University of Michigan, Ann Arbor, MI 48109, USA; Department of Molecular, Cellular, and Developmental Biology, The University of Michigan, Ann Arbor, MI 48109, USA. Electronic address: mdus@umich.edu.
University of Michigan–Ann Arbor · USUniversity of Sydney · AU

Funding

Regional Pilot And Feasibility Study Grants ProgramP30DK020572 · NIDDK · UNIVERSITY OF MICHIGAN AT ANN ARBOR · PI Mehboob A Hussain · 2013 to 2026
$24.3M
Pilot and Feasibility (P and F) ProgramP30DK089503 · NIDDK · UNIVERSITY OF MICHIGAN AT ANN ARBOR · PI Joyce Lee · 2010 to 2026
$20.3M
Research Training in BiogerontologyT32AG000114 · NIA · UNIVERSITY OF MICHIGAN AT ANN ARBOR · PI SCOTT PLETCHER · 1985 to 2026
$12.4M
Modulation of aging by Sensory PerceptionR01AG030593 · NIA · UNIVERSITY OF MICHIGAN AT ANN ARBOR · PI PLETCHER, SCOTT · 2007 to 2025
$6.1M
SYTEMS AND INTEGRATIVE BIOLOGYT32GM008322 · NIGMS · UNIVERSITY OF MICHIGAN AT ANN ARBOR · PI LOW, MALCOLM JAMES · 1990 to 2020
$5.7M
Building a unified framework for understanding bacterial gene regulation and chromosomal architectureR35GM128637 · NIGMS · UNIVERSITY OF MICHIGAN AT ANN ARBOR · PI Lydia Petra Freddolino · 2018 to 2026
$3.6M
Modulation of aging through mechanisms of nutrient demand and rewardR37AG051649 · NIA · UNIVERSITY OF MICHIGAN AT ANN ARBOR · PI SCOTT PLETCHER · 2021 to 2026
$2.3M
The role of neuroepigenetics in bidirectional behavioral statesDP2DK113750 · NIDDK · UNIVERSITY OF MICHIGAN AT ANN ARBOR · PI DUS, MONICA · 2016 to 2016
$2.0M
The role of neural signaling pathways in costs of reproduction on agingR01AG063371 · NIA · UNIVERSITY OF MICHIGAN AT ANN ARBOR · PI PLETCHER, SCOTT, PROMISLOW, DANIEL EDWARD · 2019 to 2023
$1.9M
Modulation of aging through mechanisms of nutrient demand and rewardR01AG051649 · NIA · UNIVERSITY OF MICHIGAN AT ANN ARBOR · PI PLETCHER, SCOTT · 2016 to 2020
$1.6M
Neural and molecular mechanisms of glucosensation mediating food choice behaviorR00DK097141 · NIDDK · UNIVERSITY OF MICHIGAN AT ANN ARBOR · PI DUS, MONICA · 2015 to 2017
$700k
NIA NIH HHS R01 AG030593NIA NIH HHS R01 AG063371NIA NIH HHS R37 AG051649NIA NIH HHS T32 AG000114NIDDK NIH HHS DP2 DK113750NIDDK NIH HHS P30 DK020572NIDDK NIH HHS P30 DK089503NIDDK NIH HHS R00 DK097141NIGMS NIH HHS R35 GM128637NIGMS NIH HHS T32 GM008322
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Recent studies find that sugar tastes less intense to humans with obesity, but whether this sensory change is a cause or a consequence of obesity is unclear. To tackle this question, we study the effects of a high sugar diet on sweet taste sensation and feeding behavior in Drosophila melanogaster. On this diet, fruit flies have lower taste responses to sweet stimuli, overconsume food, and develop obesity. Excess dietary sugar, but not obesity or dietary sweetness alone, caused taste deficits and overeating via the cell-autonomous action of the sugar sensor O-linked N-Acetylglucosamine (O-GlcNAc) transferase (OGT) in the sweet-sensing neurons. Correcting taste deficits by manipulating the excitability of the sweet gustatory neurons or the levels of OGT protected animals from diet-induced obesity. Our work demonstrates that the reshaping of sweet taste sensation by excess dietary sugar drives obesity and highlights the role of glucose metabolism in neural activity and behavior.

Indexed as

AnimalsDietary SugarsDrosophila melanogasterDrosophila ProteinsFeeding BehaviorNeuronsObesitySynapsesTasteDietary SugarsDrosophila Proteins

Identifiers

PMID31067455
PMCPMC6561488
OpenAlexW2944101089

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.