Evidence map›Paper›PMID 31067273›Full record

ArticlePloS one2019

Women's views about contraception requirements for biomedical research participation.

Kristen A Sullivan, Margaret Olivia Little, Nora E Rosenberg, Chifundo Zimba, Elana Jaffe, Sappho Gilbert, Jenell S Coleman, Irving Hoffman, Tiwonge Mtande, Jean Anderson and 4 more

Erratum issuedOpen access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in PloS one, 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. An erratum has been issued. Cited by 21 papers, 2 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
21citing papers in PubMed, 2 pooled it
8.4field-weighted citation impact, top 2% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

21 citing papers in PubMed, 2 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 31 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Unintended drug exposure during pregnancy in clinical trials - a survey in early drug development.International journal of clinical pharmacology and therapeutics · 2021
    Trial
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Review
  7. Sex-based differences in nuclear medicine imaging and therapy.European journal of nuclear medicine and molecular imaging · 2023
    Article
  8. Review
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Review
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Exclusion of Reproductive-aged Women in COVID-19 Vaccination and Clinical Trials.Women's health issues : official publication of the Jacobs Institute of Women's Health
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

14 authors at 3 institutions in 1 country.

Kristen A SullivanCenter for Bioethics and Department of Social Medicine, University of North Carolina School of Medicine, University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill, Chapel Hill, North Carolina, United States of America.ORCID 0000-0002-0796-078X
Margaret Olivia LittleKennedy Institute for Ethics, Georgetown University, Washington, D.C., United States of America.
Nora E RosenbergDepartment of Health Behavior, University of North Carolina Gillings School of Global Public Health, University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill, Chapel Hill, North Carolina, United States of America.
Chifundo ZimbaUNC Project Malawi, Lilongwe, Malawi.
Elana JaffeCenter for Bioethics and Department of Social Medicine, University of North Carolina School of Medicine, University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill, Chapel Hill, North Carolina, United States of America.
Sappho GilbertBerman Institute of Bioethics, Johns Hopkins University, Baltimore, Maryland, United States of America.
Jenell S ColemanDivision of Gynecology and Obstetrics, Johns Hopkins University School of Medicine, Johns Hopkins University, Baltimore, Maryland, United States of America.
Irving HoffmanInstitute for Global Health and Infectious Diseases, University of North Carolina School of Medicine, University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill, Chapel Hill, North Carolina, United States of America.
Tiwonge MtandeUNC Project Malawi, Lilongwe, Malawi.
Jean AndersonDivision of Gynecology and Obstetrics, Johns Hopkins University School of Medicine, Johns Hopkins University, Baltimore, Maryland, United States of America.
Marielle S GrossDivision of Gynecology and Obstetrics, Johns Hopkins University School of Medicine, Johns Hopkins University, Baltimore, Maryland, United States of America.ORCID 0000-0002-3009-4082
Lisa RahangdaleDepartment of Obstetrics and Gynecology, University of North Carolina School of Medicine, University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill, Chapel Hill, North Carolina, United States of America.
Ruth FadenBerman Institute of Bioethics, Johns Hopkins University, Baltimore, Maryland, United States of America.
Anne Drapkin LyerlyCenter for Bioethics and Department of Social Medicine, University of North Carolina School of Medicine, University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill, Chapel Hill, North Carolina, United States of America.ORCID 0000-0003-2904-3015
University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill · USJohns Hopkins University · USGeorgetown University · US

Funding

The PHASES Project: Pregnancy and HIV/AIDS-Seeking Equitable StudyR01AI108368 · NIAID · UNIV OF NORTH CAROLINA CHAPEL HILL · PI DAY, SUZANNE LOUISE, LYERLY, ANNE DRAPKIN · 2015 to 2024
$6.4M
Integrating Decision Making Studies into HIV Cure Trials: A real-time longitudinal assessmentR01AI127024 · NIAID · UNIV OF NORTH CAROLINA CHAPEL HILL · PI HENDERSON, GAIL E · 2016 to 2019
$2.2M
Inflammation, Vaginal Microbiota, and STI/HIV RiskR01HD092013 · NICHD · JOHNS HOPKINS UNIVERSITY · PI COLEMAN, JENELL S · 2017 to 2020
$2.2M
NIAID NIH HHS R01 AI108368NIAID NIH HHS R01 AI127024NICHD NIH HHS R01 HD092013
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The scientific and ethical importance of including women of reproductive age in biomedical research is widely acknowledged. Concerns about preventing fetal exposure to research interventions have motivated requirements for contraception among reproductive aged women in biomedical studies-often irrespective of risks and benefits or a woman's actual potential for pregnancy, raising important questions about when such requirements are appropriate. The perspectives of women themselves on these issues are largely unexplored. We conducted 140 interviews, 70 in the U.S. and 70 in Malawi, with women either living with or at-risk for HIV, exploring their views about the practice of requiring contraception in clinical trials. A majority of women interviewed from both countries indicated overall support for the practice, with seven themes characterizing advantages and disadvantages raised: reproductive control, health effects, prevention of fetal harm, burden on women, deferral to authority, autonomy regarding enrollment and birth control method, and relationship concerns. While women in the US frequently raised prevention of fetal harm as a key advantage, many other positives noted by women in both countries were related to contraception use in general, not specific to a trial context. With regard to disadvantages, U.S. women tended to focus on biomedical risks such as side effects and impact on fertility, whereas Malawian women focused on the social risks of contraception requirements, including violations of trust in marital relations and suspicions of potential infidelity. Given the potential benefits and burdens highlighted, contraception in research should be sensitive to actual fetal risk assessments; directed where justified at optimizing effective pregnancy prevention; responsive to women's reproductive preferences; and made available as an ancillary benefit even where risk thresholds do not justify requirement-in order to facilitate trials that are both ethical and robustly oriented around the interests and lives of women who will participate in them.

Indexed as

Contraception BehaviorBiomedical ResearchClinical Trials as TopicContraceptionFemaleHumansInterviews as TopicMalawiUnited States

Identifiers

PMID31067273
PMCPMC6505940
OpenAlexW2944323804

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.