Evidence map›Paper›PMID 31067242›Full record

ArticlePloS one2019

A strain comparison of Campylobacter isolated from retail poultry and human clinical cases in Atlantic Canada.

Lisa M Hodges, Catherine D Carrillo, Jacqueline P Upham, Antonela Borza, Mikaela Eisebraun, Robyn Kenwell, Steven K Mutschall, David Haldane, Emily Schleihauf, Eduardo N Taboada

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in PloS one, 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 8 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
8citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

8 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Review
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Prevalence and Antibiotic Resistance inPathogens (Basel, Switzerland) · 2022
    Review
  6. Campylobacter coli strains from Brazil can invade phagocytic and epithelial cells and induce IL-8 secretion.Brazilian journal of microbiology : [publication of the Brazilian Society for Microbiology] · 2021
    Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

10 authors.

Lisa M HodgesCanadian Food Inspection Agency, Dartmouth, Nova Scotia, Canada.ORCID 0000-0002-3360-6856
Catherine D CarrilloCanadian Food Inspection Agency, Ottawa Laboratory (Carling), Ottawa, Ontario, Canada.
Jacqueline P UphamCanadian Food Inspection Agency, Dartmouth, Nova Scotia, Canada.
Antonela BorzaCanadian Food Inspection Agency, Dartmouth, Nova Scotia, Canada.
Mikaela EisebraunCanadian Food Inspection Agency, Dartmouth, Nova Scotia, Canada.
Robyn KenwellBureau of Microbial Hazards, Food Directorate, Health Canada, Ottawa, Ontario, Canada.
Steven K MutschallNational Microbiology Laboratory at Lethbridge, Public Health Agency of Canada, Lethbridge, Alberta, Canada.
David HaldaneQueen Elizabeth II Health Sciences Centre, Mackenzie Building, Halifax, Nova Scotia.
Emily SchleihaufPublic Health Agency of Canada, Ottawa, Ontario, Canada.
Eduardo N TaboadaNational Microbiology Laboratory at Lethbridge, Public Health Agency of Canada, Lethbridge, Alberta, Canada.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Campylobacter is the leading cause of food-borne bacterial disease in Canada and many developed countries. One of the most common sources of human campylobacteriosis is considered to be the consumption or handling of raw or undercooked poultry. To date, few Canadian studies have investigated both the prevalence of Campylobacter on retail poultry and its potential impact on human clinical cases. The objective of this study was to evaluate the prevalence of Campylobacter spp. at the retail level and the correlation between subtypes recovered from chicken and those recovered from human clinical cases within the province of Nova Scotia, Canada. From this study 354 human clinical isolates were obtained from provincial hospital laboratories and a total of 480 packages of raw poultry cuts were sampled from retail outlets, yielding 312 isolates (65%), of all which were subtyped using comparative genomic fingerprinting (CGF). Of the 312 chicken isolates, the majority of isolates were C. jejuni (91.7%), followed by C. coli (7.7%) and C. lari (0.6%). Using CGF to subtype C. jejuni and C. coli isolates, 99 and 152 subtypes were recovered from chicken and clinical cases, respectively. The most prevalent human and chicken subtypes found in NS are similar to those observed nationally; indicating that the Campylobacter from this study appear to reflect of the profile of Campylobacter subtypes circulating nationally. Of the subtypes observed, only 36 subtypes were common between the two groups, however, these subtypes represented 48.3% of the clinical isolates collected. The findings from this study provides evidence that in Nova Scotia, retail poultry can act as a reservoir for Campylobacter subtypes that have been implicated in human illness.

Indexed as

Food MicrobiologyAnimalsCampylobacterChickensFood ContaminationHumansNova ScotiaSpecies Specificity

Identifiers

PMID31067242
PMCPMC6505856

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.