Evidence map›Paper›PMID 31067231›Full record

ArticlePLoS neglected tropical diseases2019

Endoparasites and vector-borne pathogens in dogs from Greek islands: Pathogen distribution and zoonotic implications.

Anastasia Diakou, Angela Di Cesare, Simone Morelli, Mariasole Colombo, Lenaig Halos, Giulia Simonato, Androniki Tamvakis, Frederic Beugnet, Barbara Paoletti, Donato Traversa

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in PLoS neglected tropical diseases, 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 38 papers, 2 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
38citing papers in PubMed, 2 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

38 citing papers in PubMed, 2 syntheses or guidelines pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Review
  6. Article
  7. Serosurvey ofPathogens (Basel, Switzerland) · 2024
    Article
  8. First Evidence ofVeterinary sciences · 2024
    Article
  9. Article
  10. Beyond Borders:Veterinary sciences · 2024
    Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

10 authors.

Anastasia DiakouLaboratory of Parasitology and Parasitic Diseases, School of Veterinary Medicine, Faculty of Health Sciences, Aristotle University of Thessaloniki, Thessaloniki, Greece.
Angela Di CesareFaculty of Veterinary Medicine, University of Teramo, Località Piano D'Accio snc., Teramo, Italy.
Simone MorelliFaculty of Veterinary Medicine, University of Teramo, Località Piano D'Accio snc., Teramo, Italy.ORCID 0000-0001-6344-0239
Mariasole ColomboFaculty of Veterinary Medicine, University of Teramo, Località Piano D'Accio snc., Teramo, Italy.
Lenaig HalosBoehringer-Ingelheim Animal Health, Lyon, France.
Giulia SimonatoDepartment of Animal Medicine, Production and Health, University of Padua, Viale dell'Università, Legnaro, Padua, Italy.
Androniki TamvakisLaboratory of Ecology and System Dynamics, Department of Marine Sciences, University of the Aegean Mytilene, Lesvos, Greece.
Frederic BeugnetBoehringer-Ingelheim Animal Health, Lyon, France.
Barbara PaolettiFaculty of Veterinary Medicine, University of Teramo, Località Piano D'Accio snc., Teramo, Italy.
Donato TraversaFaculty of Veterinary Medicine, University of Teramo, Località Piano D'Accio snc., Teramo, Italy.ORCID 0000-0003-3411-1326

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The present study investigated the presence of endo- and ecto-parasites, and vector-borne pathogens, in dogs from four islands of Greece. A total of 200 (123 owned and 77 sheltered) dogs were examined with different microscopic, serological and molecular methods. Of the examined dogs, 130 (65%) were positive for one or more parasites and/or vector-borne pathogens. The most common zoonotic intestinal helminths recorded were Ancylostomatidae (12.5%) and Toxocara canis (3.5%). Ninety-three dogs (46.5%) seroreacted to Rickettsia conorii. Twenty-two (11%) of them were also PCR positive and 7 (3.5%) showed corpuscles suggestive of Rickettsia spp. on the blood smears. Nineteen dogs (9.5%) were seropositive for Ehrlichia canis, three of them being also PCR positive. Dogs positive for Anaplasma phagocytophilum-Anaplasma platys (1%), Dirofilaria immitis (0.5%) and Babesia canis (0.5%) were also found. Fleas and ticks were recorded in 53 (26.5%) and 50 (25%) dogs, respectively, and all specimens were identified as Ctenocephalides felis felis and Rhipicephalus sanguineus sensu lato. Binary multiple univariate Generalized Linear Models were used to investigate factors and clinical signs related to the recorded positivity, while the association of specific signs with the pathogens was evaluated using tests of independence. Knowledge of occurrence and impact of zoonotic parasites and vector-borne pathogens in dog populations is crucial to prevent the infection in animals and people, and to control the risk of spreading of these pathogens in endemic and non-endemic areas.

Indexed as

Disease VectorsAnimalsDog DiseasesDogsFemaleFlea InfestationsGreeceHumansMaleParasitesRickettsiaSiphonapteraTicksZoonoses

Identifiers

PMID31067231
PMCPMC6527238

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.