Evidence map›Paper›PMID 31067228›Full record

SynthesisPLoS neglected tropical diseases2019

Comparative accuracy of typhoid diagnostic tools: A Bayesian latent-class network analysis.

Paul Arora, Kristian Thorlund, Darren R Brenner, Jason R Andrews

Open access · goldAbstract readComparative StudyNetwork Meta-AnalysisSystematic Review
In one paragraph

Synthesis in PLoS neglected tropical diseases, 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 19 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
19citing papers in PubMed
5.0field-weighted citation impact, top 5% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

19 citing papers in PubMed, 35 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Trial
  2. A case for eliminating Widal testing for enteric fever, India.Bulletin of the World Health Organization · 2026
    Article
  3. Review
  4. Article
  5. Diagnostic accuracy of three tests forPreventive medicine reports · 2025
    Article
  6. Article
  7. Review
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Review
  11. Article
  12. Review
  13. Antibiotic Use Prior to Hospital Presentation Among Individuals With Suspected Enteric Fever in Nepal, Bangladesh, and Pakistan.Clinical infectious diseases : an official publication of the Infectious Diseases Society of America · 2020
    Article
  14. Article
  15. The Current Status of Enteric Fever Diagnostics and Implications for Disease Control.Clinical infectious diseases : an official publication of the Infectious Diseases Society of America · 2020
    Article
  16. Environmental Surveillance as a Tool for Identifying High-risk Settings for Typhoid Transmission.Clinical infectious diseases : an official publication of the Infectious Diseases Society of America · 2020
    Review
  17. Review
  18. Microorganisms · 2020
    Article
  19. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors at 4 institutions in 2 countries.

Paul AroraDalla Lana School of Public Health, Division of Epidemiology, University of Toronto, Ontario, Canada.ORCID 0000-0001-6617-3631
Kristian ThorlundDepartment of Health Research Methods, Evidence, and Impact, McMaster University, Hamilton, Ontario, Canada.
Darren R BrennerDepartments of Oncology and Community Health Sciences, Cumming School of Medicine, University of Calgary, Calgary, Alberta, Canada.
Jason R AndrewsDivision of Infectious Diseases and Geographic Medicine, Stanford University, Stanford, California, United States of America.
Impact · CAStanford University · USUniversity of Calgary · CAUniversity of Toronto · CA

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundTyphoid fevers are infections caused by the bacteria Salmonella enterica serovar Typhi (Salmonella Typhi) and Paratyphi A, B and C (Salmonella Paratyphi). Approximately 17.8 million incident cases of typhoid fever occur annually, and incidence is highest in children. The accuracy of current diagnostic tests of typhoid fever is poorly understood. We aimed to determine the comparative accuracy of available tests for the pediatric population.

methodsWe first conducted a systematic literature review to identify studies that compared diagnostic tests for typhoid fever in children (aged ≤15 years) to blood culture results. We applied a Bayesian latent-class extension to a network meta-analysis model. We modelled known diagnostic properties of bone marrow culture and the relationship between bone marrow and blood culture as informative priors in a Bayesian framework. We tested sensitivities for the proportion of negative blood samples that were false as well as bone marrow sensitivity and specificity.

resultsWe found 510 comparisons from 196 studies and 57 specific to the pediatric population. IgM-based tests outperformed their IgG-based counterparts for ELISA and Typhidot tests. The lateral flow IgG test performed comparatively well with 92% sensitivity (72% to 98% across scenario analyses) and 94% specificity. The most sensitive test of those investigated for the South Asian pediatric population was the Reverse Passive Hemagglutination Assay with 99% sensitivity (98% - 100% across scenario analyses). Adding a Widal slide test to other typhoid diagnostics did not substantially improve diagnostic performance beyond the single test alone, however, a lateral flow-based IgG rapid test combined with the typhoid/paratyphoid (TPT) assay yielded improvements in sensitivity without substantial declines in specificity and was the best performing combination test in this setting.

conclusionIn the pediatric population, lateral-flow IgG, TPT and Reverse Passive Hemagglutination tests had high diagnostic accuracy compared to other diagnostics. Combinations of tests may provide a feasible option to increase diagnostic sensitivity. South Asia has the most informed set of data on typhoid diagnostic testing accuracy, and the evidence base in other important regions needs to be expanded.

Indexed as

Diagnostic Tests, RoutineTyphoid FeverAdolescentAntibodies, BacterialBayes TheoremChildChild, PreschoolFemaleHumansMaleReagent Kits, DiagnosticSalmonella typhiSensitivity and SpecificityYoung AdultAntibodies, BacterialReagent Kits, Diagnostic

Identifiers

PMID31067228
PMCPMC6527309
OpenAlexW2943950677

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.