Evidence map›Paper›PMID 31067211›Full record

ArticleMedical science monitor : international medical journal of experimental and clinical research2019

Improving the Surgical Effect for Primary Liver Cancer with Intraoperative Fluorescence Navigation Compared with Intraoperative Ultrasound.

Bing Liu, Tian Liu, Ming Su, Ya-Qi Ma, Bei-Feng Zhang, Ye-Fei Wang, Bing-Yang Hu, Yong-Liang Chen

Open access · hybridAbstract readComparative Study
In one paragraph

Article in Medical science monitor : international medical journal of experimental and clinical research, 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 13 papers, 4 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
13citing papers in PubMed, 4 pooled it
1.4field-weighted citation impact, top 20% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

13 citing papers in PubMed, 4 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 23 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Guideline
  3. Pooled it
  4. Pooled it
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Intraoperative fluorescence molecular imaging accelerates the coming of precision surgery in China.European journal of nuclear medicine and molecular imaging · 2022
    Review
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Review
  13. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors at 3 institutions in 1 country.

Bing LiuDepartment of Hepatobiliary Surgery, Chinese People's Liberation Army (PLA) General Hospital, Beijing, China (mainland).
Tian LiuDepartment of Hepatobiliary Surgery, Chinese People's Liberation Army (PLA) General Hospital, Beijing, China (mainland).
Ming SuDepartment of Hepatobiliary Surgery, Chinese People's Liberation Army (PLA) General Hospital, Beijing, China (mainland).
Ya-Qi MaDepartment of Pathology, Chinese People's Liberation Army (PLA) General Hospital, Beijing, China (mainland).
Bei-Feng ZhangDepartment of Anesthesia Operation Center, Chinese People's Liberation Army (PLA) General Hospital, Beijing, China (mainland).
Ye-Fei WangDepartment of General Surgery, The First Hospital of Yulin, Yulin, Shaanxi, China (mainland).
Bing-Yang HuDepartment of Hepatobiliary Surgery, Chinese People's Liberation Army (PLA) General Hospital, Beijing, China (mainland).
Yong-Liang ChenDepartment of Hepatobiliary Surgery, Chinese People's Liberation Army (PLA) General Hospital, Beijing, China (mainland).
Chinese People's Liberation Army · CNChinese PLA General Hospital · CNYulin University · CN

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

BACKGROUND This study aimed to compare the application value of intraoperative fluorescence navigation technology (FNT) and intraoperative ultrasound (IOUS) in primary liver cancer surgery. MATERIAL AND METHODS Fifty consecutive patients with primary liver cancer scheduled to receive surgical treatment were divided into FNT group and IOUS group. FNT and IOUS were separately used to guide tumor resection and detect new cancerous lesions in the 2 groups. The complete tumor resection rate (R0) resection rate, length of the tumor distance from cutting edge, the diagnostic efficacy of cancerous nodules and the fluorescence imaging characteristics of different types tumors were recorded. RESULTS The R0 resection rate was 100% (25 out of 25 patients) in the FNT group and 96% (24 out of 25 patients) in the IOUS group. In the FNT group, 1 case (4%, 1 out of 25 patients) had cancer tissue that was less than 1 cm from the cutting edge, compared to 7 cases (28%, 7 out of 25 patients) in the IOUS group (P=0.049), which was a significant difference. In the remaining livers of 50 consecutive patients, FNT found 5 new cancerous nodules with a sensitivity of 71.4%, a specificity of 11.1%, and a false-positive rate of 88.9%; for IOUS the results were 42.9%, 88.9%, 11.1%. The fluorescence imaging characteristics of all well-differentiated hepatocellular carcinomas were tumor tissue imaging, but all other types of tumors were ring imaging around the tumor. CONCLUSIONS FNT can improve the R0 resection rate, ensure a safe distance between tumor and cutting edge and can identify more new cancerous nodules compared to IOUS. Thus, FNT could improve the surgical treatment effect for primary liver cancer and hopefully further improve the prognosis of patients.

Indexed as

AdultAgedCarcinoma, HepatocellularCholangiocarcinomaContrast MediaFemaleFluorescenceHepatectomyHumansIndocyanine GreenIntraoperative CareLiverLiver NeoplasmsMaleMiddle AgedMonitoring, IntraoperativeContrast MediaIndocyanine Green

Identifiers

PMID31067211
PMCPMC6521732
OpenAlexW2944309412

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.