Evidence map›Paper›PMID 31066916›Full record

SynthesisJournal of the American Geriatrics Society2019

Effectiveness of Ambulatory Telemedicine Care in Older Adults: A Systematic Review.

John A Batsis, Peter R DiMilia, Lillian M Seo, Karen L Fortuna, Meaghan A Kennedy, Heather B Blunt, Pamela J Bagley, Jessica Brooks, Emma Brooks, Soo Yeon Kim and 3 more

Abstract readSystematic Review
In one paragraph

Synthesis in Journal of the American Geriatrics Society, 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 105 papers, 10 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
105citing papers in PubMed, 10 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

105 citing papers in PubMed, 10 syntheses or guidelines pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Pooled it
  4. Pooled it
  5. Pooled it
  6. Pooled it
  7. Pooled it
  8. Pooled it
  9. Pooled it
  10. Pooled it
  11. Trial
  12. Trial
  13. Patient Engagement Using Telemedicine in Primary Care during COVID-19 Pandemic: A Trial Study.International journal of environmental research and public health · 2022
    Trial
  14. Trial
  15. Trial
  16. Observational
  17. Article
  18. Review
  19. Article
  20. Review

45 more citing papers are in PubMed but not listed here.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

13 authors.

John A BatsisGeisel School of Medicine at Dartmouth, Dartmouth College, Hanover, New Hampshire.ORCID 0000-0002-0845-4416
Peter R DiMiliaGeisel School of Medicine at Dartmouth, Dartmouth College, Hanover, New Hampshire.
Lillian M SeoGeisel School of Medicine at Dartmouth, Dartmouth College, Hanover, New Hampshire.
Karen L FortunaGeisel School of Medicine at Dartmouth, Dartmouth College, Hanover, New Hampshire.
Meaghan A KennedyGeisel School of Medicine at Dartmouth, Dartmouth College, Hanover, New Hampshire.
Heather B BluntBiomedical Libraries, Dartmouth College, Hanover, New Hampshire.
Pamela J BagleyBiomedical Libraries, Dartmouth College, Hanover, New Hampshire.
Jessica BrooksInstitute on Aging, Portland State University, Portland, Oregon.
Emma BrooksDepartment of Medicine, Dartmouth-Hitchcock Medical Center, Lebanon, New Hampshire.
Soo Yeon KimGeisel School of Medicine at Dartmouth, Dartmouth College, Hanover, New Hampshire.
Rebecca K MasutaniGeisel School of Medicine at Dartmouth, Dartmouth College, Hanover, New Hampshire.
Martha L BruceGeisel School of Medicine at Dartmouth, Dartmouth College, Hanover, New Hampshire.
Stephen J BartelsMongan Institute, Massachusetts General Hospital, Harvard Medical School, Boston, Massachusetts.

Funding

Translational Engineering in Cancer (TEC)P30CA023108 · NCI · DARTMOUTH COLLEGE · PI Fred W Kolling IV · 1985 to 2026
$91.3M
Treatment Development & Evaluation CoreP30DA029926 · NIDA · DARTMOUTH COLLEGE · PI Lisa A. Marsch · 2011 to 2026
$21.5M
SYNERGY: The Dartmouth Center for clinical and Translational ScienceUL1TR001086 · NCATS · DARTMOUTH COLLEGE · PI GREEN, ALAN I · 2013 to 2017
$18.3M
Mobile Health Obesity Wellness Intervention in Rural Older Adults_Res1K23AG051681 · NIA · UNIV OF NORTH CAROLINA CHAPEL HILL · PI BATSIS, JOHN A. · 2016 to 2022
$1.1M
The Economic Cost of Joint RetirementR03AG023108 · NIA · RAND CORPORATION · PI MAESTAS, NICOLE A · 2003 to 2004
$177k
Liver X Receptors as Therapeutic Targets in Alzheimer?s DiseaseR21AG029926 · NIA · CASE WESTERN RESERVE UNIVERSITY · PI LANDRETH, GARY E. · 2007 to 2007
$21k
NCATS NIH HHS UL1 TR001086NCCDPHP CDC HHS U48 DP005018NCI NIH HHS P30 CA023108NIA NIH HHS CDC U48DP005018NIA NIH HHS K23 AG051681NIA NIH HHS K23AG051681NIA NIH HHS NCATS UL1TR001086NIA NIH HHS NCI P30CA023108-37NIA NIH HHS NIDA P30DA029926NIDA NIH HHS P30 DA029926
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundDisparities in healthcare access and delivery, caused by transportation and health workforce difficulties, negatively impact individuals living in rural areas. These challenges are especially prominent in older adults.

designWe systematically evaluated the feasibility, acceptability, and effectiveness in providing telemedicine (TMed), searching the English-language literature for studies (January 2012 to July 2018) in the following databases: Medline (PubMed); Cochrane Library (Wiley); Web of Science; CINAHL; EMBASE (Ovid); and PsycINFO (EBSCO).

participantsOlder adults (mean age = 65 years or older, and none were younger than 60 years).

interventionsInterventions consisted of live, synchronous, two-way videoconferencing communication in nonhospital settings. All medical interventions were included. MEASUREMENTS: Quality assessment, using the Cochrane Collaboration's Risk-of-Bias Tool, was applied on all included articles, including a qualitative summary of all articles.

resultsOf 6616 citations, we reviewed the full text of 1173 articles, excluding 1047 that did not meet criteria. Of the 17 randomized controlled trials, the United States was the country with the most trials (6 [35%]), with cohort sizes ranging from 3 to 844 (median = 35) participants. Risk of bias among included studies varied from low to high. Our qualitative analysis suggests that TMed can improve health outcomes in older adults and that it could be used in this population.

conclusionsTMed is feasible and acceptable in delivering care to older adults. Research should focus on well-designed randomized trials to overcome the high degree of bias observed in our synthesis. Clinicians should consider using TMed in routine practice to overcome barriers of distance and access to care. J Am Geriatr Soc 67:1737-1749, 2019.

Indexed as

Quality Assurance, Health CareAgedAged, 80 and overAmbulatory CareFeasibility StudiesFemaleHealth Services for the AgedHumansMaleTelemedicineeffectivenessolder adultruraltelemedicine

Identifiers

PMID31066916
PMCPMC6684409

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.