Evidence map›Paper›PMID 31066893›Full record

ArticleJournal of the American Medical Informatics Association : JAMIA2019

Is research on patient portals attuned to health equity? A scoping review.

Marcy G Antonio, Olga Petrovskaya, Francis Lau

Abstract readScoping Review
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of the American Medical Informatics Association : JAMIA, 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 58 papers, 4 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
58citing papers in PubMed, 4 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

58 citing papers in PubMed, 4 syntheses or guidelines pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Adult patient access to electronic health records.The Cochrane database of systematic reviews · 2021
    Pooled it
  4. The State of Evidence in Patient Portals: Umbrella Review.Journal of medical Internet research · 2020
    Pooled it
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Moving beyond barriers: a mixed-method study to develop evidence-based strategies to improve implementation of PROMs in clinical oncology care.Quality of life research : an international journal of quality of life aspects of treatment, care and rehabilitation · 2025
    Article
  13. Article
  14. Observational
  15. Observational
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors.

Marcy G AntonioSchools of Health Information Science and Nursing, Victoria, British Columbia, Canada.
Olga PetrovskayaFaculty of Nursing, University of Alberta, Edmonton, Alberta, Canada.
Francis LauSchool of Health Information Science, University of Victoria, Victoria, British Columbia, Canada.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

objectiveOur scoping review examined how research on patient portals addresses health equity. Questions guiding our review were: 1) What health equity concepts are addressed in patient portal research-both explicitly and implicitly? 2) What are the gaps? 3) Is the potential for ehealth-related health inequities explicitly acknowledged in studies on patient portals? 4) What novel approaches and interventions to reduce health inequities are tested in patient portal research? MATERIALS AND

methodsWe searched 4 databases. Search terms included "patient portal" in combination with a comprehensive list of health equity terms relevant in ehealth context. Authors independently reviewed the papers during initial screening and full-text review. We applied the eHealth Equity Framework to develop search terms and analyze the included studies.

resultsBased on eHealth Equity Framework categories, the main findings generated from 65 reviewed papers were governance structures, ehealth policies, and cultural and societal values may further inequities; social position of providers and patients introduces differential preferences in portal use; equitable portal implementation can be supported through diverse user-centered design; and intermediary strategies are typically recommended to encourage portal use across populations. DISCUSSION: The predominant focus on barriers in portal use may be inadvertently placing individual responsibility in addressing these barriers on patients already experiencing the greatest health disparities. This approach may mask the impact of the socio-technical-economic-political context on outcomes for different populations.

conclusionTo support equitable health outcomes related to patient portals we need to look beyond intermediary initiatives and develop equitable strategies across policy, practice, research, and implementation.

Indexed as

Digital DivideHealth EquityInformaticsPatient PortalsBibliometricsBiomedical ResearchHumansPatient Access to RecordsSocial Determinants of HealthUnited KingdomUnited Statesdigital divideehealthhealth equityhealth literacypatient portalssocial determinants of health

Identifiers

PMID31066893
PMCPMC7647227

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.