ArticleRevista de saude publica2019
Scheduling models and primary health care quality: a multilevel and cross-sectional study.
Article in Revista de saude publica, 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 9 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
9 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.
- Absenteeism in child health services: a systematic review.Revista brasileira de enfermagem · 2023Pooled it
- Determinants of exclusive utilisation of scheduled and unscheduled primary care visits: a cross-sectional study in Portugal.BMC primary care · 2026Article
- Advanced Access in the Family Health Strategy: progress or setback for the nursing team?Revista brasileira de enfermagem · 2026Article
- Advanced Access in Primary Healthcare and Its Effects on Emergency Department Utilization: A Rapid Review.Healthcare (Basel, Switzerland) · 2025Review
- Translation and cross-cultural adaptation into Brazilian Portuguese of the ORAAprof instrument for Advanced Access.Revista brasileira de enfermagem · 2025Article
- Supporting a rapid primary care response to emergent communicable disease threats with PACK (Practical Approach to Care Kit) in Florianópolis, Brazil.BMJ global health · 2024Article
- Successes, weaknesses, and recommendations to strengthen primary health care: a scoping review.Archives of public health = Archives belges de sante publique · 2023Article
- Article
- Physician and Practice Characteristics Associated with Family Physician Panel Size.Journal of the American Board of Family Medicine : JABFMArticle
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
objectiveTo evaluate whether the scheduling model influences the perception of the user about the quality of primary health care centers.
methodsThis is a cross-sectional and population-based study that measured the quality of centers by the Primary Care Assessment Tool (PCATool-Brazil), applied to adult users (n = 409) from 11 health centers in Florianópolis, state of Santa Catarina. Multilevel analysis was used to verify the relationship between the score of general quality of the primary health care and the scheduling model. The independent variables (age, skin color, scheduling model, panel size by primary health team, poverty ratio as income proxy, number of health teams, presence of economically interest areas, number of medical appointments in one year per primary health team, number of people treated in one year per health team), with p < 0.20 were selected for the multilevel model, which was adjusted with aggregates of information from users and health centers.
resultsThe health center that used advanced access had a general score of 7.04, while those using a weekly carve-out had a score of 6.26; the carve-out every 15 days, score of 5.87; and the traditional carve-out, score of 6.29.
conclusionsThe scheduling model of advanced access had a positive effect on the quality of primary health care, in the perception of users.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.