Evidence map›Paper›PMID 31066791›Full record

ArticleEinstein (Sao Paulo, Brazil)2019

Most frequent errors in inhalation technique of patients with asthma treated at a tertiary care hospital.

Carlos Leonardo Carvalho Pessôa, Maria Julia da Silva Mattos, Artur Renato Moura Alho, Marianna Martini Fischmann, Bruno Mendes Haerdy, Ana Carolina Castro Côrtes, Flávio de Oliveira Mendes, Sandra Mara Silva Brignol

Open access · diamondAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Einstein (Sao Paulo, Brazil), 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
4citing papers in PubMed
0.9field-weighted citation impact, top 24% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

4 citing papers in PubMed, 8 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Review
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Carlos Leonardo Carvalho PessôaUniversidade Federal Fluminense, Niterói, RJ, Brazil.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-1440-0393
Maria Julia da Silva MattosUniversidade Federal Fluminense, Niterói, RJ, Brazil.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0003-1720-6470
Artur Renato Moura AlhoUniversidade Federal Fluminense, Niterói, RJ, Brazil.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-6442-3171
Marianna Martini FischmannUniversidade Federal Fluminense, Niterói, RJ, Brazil.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0001-6210-1542
Bruno Mendes HaerdyUniversidade Federal Fluminense, Niterói, RJ, Brazil.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-5506-2378
Ana Carolina Castro CôrtesUniversidade Federal Fluminense, Niterói, RJ, Brazil.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0001-7515-0976
Flávio de Oliveira MendesUniversidade Federal Fluminense, Niterói, RJ, Brazil.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-7924-7983
Sandra Mara Silva BrignolUniversidade Federal Fluminense, Niterói, RJ, Brazil.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-7728-2304
Universidade Federal Fluminense · BR

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

objectiveTo demonstrate the most frequent errors in inhalation technique in patients with asthma undergoing treatment at a tertiary care hospital.

methodsA cross-sectional study with a convenience sample of asthma patients aged 18 years or over, treated at a pulmonology outpatient clinic of a tertiary care hospital. The assessment of inhalation technique of users of the dry powder inhalers Aerolizer®, Aerocaps and Diskus®, or metered-dose inhalers was based on the manufacturer's instructions for use of each inhaler device. Patients demonstrated the inhalation technique with empty inhaler devices, and it was considered correct when all stages were performed properly, or when errors probably did not interfere with the treatment outcome.

resultsAmong 71 participants, 43 (60.5%) performed inhalation technique incorrectly. Among metered-dose inhalers and dry powder inhalers users, inhalation technique errors were found in 84.2% and 51.9%, respectively (p=0.013). Errors were more frequent at the exhalation stage (67.4%), followed by breathing in (58.1%) and apnea (51.2%). In the group using dry powder inhalers, the most common errors occurred during exhalation and, for those using metered-dose inhalers, the most compromised stage was aspiration.

conclusionErrors were more frequent among those using metered-dose inhalers compared with dry powder inhalers. Misconceptions are more common at the expiration stage among users of dry powder inhalers and in aspiration among those on metered-dose inhalers.

Indexed as

Administration, InhalationMedication ErrorsAdultAgedAged, 80 and overAsthmaCross-Sectional StudiesDry Powder InhalersFemaleHumansMaleMetered Dose InhalersMiddle AgedPatient Education as TopicSelf AdministrationSocioeconomic Factors

Identifiers

PMID31066791
PMCPMC6497119
OpenAlexW2942680465

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.