Evidence map›Paper›PMID 31066700›Full record

ArticleJournal of medical Internet research2019

Effects, Adherence, and Therapists' Perceptions of Web- and Mobile-Supported Group Therapy for Depression: Mixed-Methods Study.

Raphael Schuster, Inanna Kalthoff, Alexandra Walther, Lena Köhldorfer, Edith Partinger, Thomas Berger, Anton-Rupert Laireiter

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of medical Internet research, 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 15 papers, 4 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
15citing papers in PubMed, 4 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

15 citing papers in PubMed, 4 syntheses or guidelines pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Pooled it
  4. Pooled it
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Adapting evidence-based group therapies following COVID-19 restrictions.Australasian psychiatry : bulletin of Royal Australian and New Zealand College of Psychiatrists · 2022
    Article
  12. Review
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors.

Raphael Schuster *Center for Clinical Psychology, Psychotherapy and Health Psychology, Department of Psychology, University of Salzburg, Salzburg, Austria.ORCID 0000-0002-6447-9132
Inanna KalthoffCenter for Clinical Psychology, Psychotherapy and Health Psychology, Department of Psychology, University of Salzburg, Salzburg, Austria.ORCID 0000-0002-8604-2185
Alexandra WaltherCenter for Clinical Psychology, Psychotherapy and Health Psychology, Department of Psychology, University of Salzburg, Salzburg, Austria.ORCID 0000-0003-2472-1796
Lena KöhldorferDepartment of Applied Psychology: Health, Development and Promotion, Faculty of Psychology, University of Vienna, Vienna, Austria.ORCID 0000-0001-9023-9928
Edith PartingerDepartment of Applied Psychology: Health, Development and Promotion, Faculty of Psychology, University of Vienna, Vienna, Austria.ORCID 0000-0003-3241-776X
Thomas BergerDepartment of Clinical Psychology and Psychotherapy, University of Berne, Berne, Switzerland.ORCID 0000-0002-2432-7791
Anton-Rupert LaireiterCenter for Clinical Psychology, Psychotherapy and Health Psychology, Department of Psychology, University of Salzburg, Salzburg, Austria.ORCID 0000-0001-6038-6775

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundBlended group therapy (bGT) has been investigated a several times for anxiety and depression, but information on patients' adherence to and therapists' perception of the novel format is nonexistent. Furthermore, many studies investigated mainly female and highly educated populations, limiting the validity of previous findings.

objectiveThis study aimed to reduce the gaps and limitations of the previous findings by evaluating an integrated internet- and mobile-supported bGT format.

methodsA total of 27 patients diagnosed with major depression (14/27, 52% female and 7/27, 25.9% compulsory education) participated in a 7-week treatment at a university outpatient clinic. Furthermore, 8 novice therapists participated in semistructured interviews and a subsequent cross-validation survey.

resultsPrimary symptom reduction was high (d=1.31 to 1.51) and remained stable for the follow-up period. Therapists identified advantages (eg, patient engagement, treatment intensification, and improved therapeutic relation) and disadvantages (eg, increased workload, data issues, and undesired effects) of bGT. The required online guidance time was 10.3 min per patient and week, including guidance on exercises (67% or 6.9 min) and intimate communication (33% or 3.4 min). Concerning patients' adherence to bGT, tracked completion of all Web-based and mobile tasks was high and comparable with group attendance.

conclusionsResults suggest high feasibility of bGT in a gender-balanced, moderately educated sample. bGT provides group therapists with tools for individual care, resulting in an optimization of the therapy process, and high completion rates of the implemented bGT elements. The limited work experience of the involved therapists restricts the study findings, and potential drawbacks need to be regarded in the development of future bGT interventions.

Indexed as

AdultAllied Health PersonnelDepressionFemaleHumansInternetMalePatient CompliancePsychotherapy, GroupSurveys and QuestionnairesTelemedicinecomputer-assisted therapydepressioneHealthgroup therapymobile phonemonitoringprofessional-patient relations

Identifiers

PMID31066700
PMCPMC6533044

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.