ArticleJMIR cancer2019
Designing and Testing Apps to Support Patients With Cancer: Looking to Behavioral Science to Lead the Way.
Article in JMIR cancer, 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 13 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
13 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.
- Human-Centered Design of Mobile Health Apps for Older Adults: Systematic Review and Narrative Synthesis.JMIR mHealth and uHealth · 2022Pooled it
- Identifying Influential Theories in Human-Computer Interaction Within Health Informatics: A Systematic Review.Health science reports · 2025Review
- The DISCO App: A pilot test of a multi-level intervention to reduce the financial burden of cancer through improved cost communication.PEC innovation · 2022Article
- The SMILe integrated care model in allogeneic SteM cell TransplantatIon faciLitated by eHealth: a protocol for a hybrid effectiveness-implementation randomised controlled trial.BMC health services research · 2022Article
- Article
- A smartphone app to improve the safety of patients undergoing treatment with oral antineoplastic agents: 4 years of experience in a university hospital.Frontiers in public health · 2022Article
- Development of an integrated model of care for allogeneic stem cell transplantation facilitated by eHealth-the SMILe study.Supportive care in cancer : official journal of the Multinational Association of Supportive Care in Cancer · 2021Article
- A Scoping Review of Behavioral Interventions Addressing Medical Financial Hardship.Population health management · 2021Article
- Article
- A Review of Research on Disparities in the Care of Black and White Patients With Cancer in Detroit.Frontiers in oncology · 2021Review
- The increasing value of eHealth in the delivery of patient-centred cancer care.The Lancet. Oncology · 2020Review
- User-Centered App Design for Acutely Ill Children and Adolescents.Journal of pediatric oncology nursing : official journal of the Association of Pediatric Oncology NursesArticle
- Use of theory to guide development and application of sensor technologies in Nursing.Nursing outlookArticle
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundBehavioral science has a long and strong tradition of rigorous experimental and applied methodologies, which have produced several influential and far-reaching theoretical frameworks and have guided countless inquiries of human behavior in various contexts. In cancer care, behavioral scientists have established a firm foundation of research focused on understanding the experience of cancer and using that understanding to design and implement theory- and evidenced-based interventions to help patients cope with the cancer experience. Given the rich behavioral research base in oncology, behavioral scientists are ideally positioned to lead the integration of evidence-based science on behavior and behavior change into the development of smartphone apps supporting patients with cancer. Smartphone apps are being disseminated to patients with cancer with claims of being able to help them negotiate areas of vulnerability in their cancer experience. However, the vast majority of these apps are developed without the rigor and expertise of behavioral scientists.
objectiveIn this article, we have illustrated the importance of behavioral science leading the development and evaluation of apps to support patients with cancer by providing an illustrative scientific process that our team of behavioral scientists, patient stakeholders, medical oncologists, and software developers used to empirically design and evaluate 2 patient-focused apps: the Discussion of Cost App (DISCO App) and MyPatientPal.
methodsUsing a focused literature review and a descriptive roadmap of our team's process for designing and evaluating patient-focused behavioral apps for patients with cancer, we have demonstrated how behavioral scientists are integral to the development of empirically sound apps to help support patients with cancer. Specifically, we have illustrated the process by which our multidisciplinary team combined the established user-centered design principles and behavioral science theory and scientific rigor to design and evaluate 2 patient-focused apps.
resultsOn the basis of initial acceptability and feasibility testing among patients and providers, our team has demonstrated how critical behavioral science is for designing and evaluating app-based interventions for patients with cancer.
conclusionsBehavioral science can and should be coupled with user-centered design principles to provide theoretical guidance and the rigor of the scientific method, thereby adding the much-needed and critical evidence for these types of app-based interventions for patients with cancer.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.