Evidence map›Paper›PMID 31066688›Full record

ArticleJMIR human factors2019

Creating an mHealth App for Colorectal Cancer Screening: User-Centered Design Approach.

Lauren Griffin, Donghee Lee, Alyssa Jaisle, Peter Carek, Thomas George, Eric Laber, Benjamin Lok, François Modave, Electra Paskett, Janice Krieger

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in JMIR human factors, 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 36 papers, 3 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
36citing papers in PubMed, 3 pooled it
13.5field-weighted citation impact, top 1% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

36 citing papers in PubMed, 3 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 62 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Pooled it
  4. Trial
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Review
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Smartphone-based application for self-management of patients with colorectal cancer: development and usability evaluation.Supportive care in cancer : official journal of the Multinational Association of Supportive Care in Cancer · 2022
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

10 authors at 5 institutions in 1 country.

Lauren GriffinSTEM Translational Communication Center, University of Florida, Gainesville, FL, United States.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0003-3129-7882
Donghee LeeSTEM Translational Communication Center, University of Florida, Gainesville, FL, United States.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-9932-4376
Alyssa JaisleSTEM Translational Communication Center, University of Florida, Gainesville, FL, United States.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-9848-5709
Peter CarekDepartment of Community Health and Family Medicine, University of Florida, Gainesville, FL, United States.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0003-3937-1733
Thomas GeorgeDivision of Oncology, College of Medicine, University of Florida, Gainesville, FL, United States.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-6249-9180
Eric LaberStatistics Department, North Carolina State University, Raleigh, NC, United States.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0003-2640-7696
Benjamin LokDepartment of Computer and Information Science and Engineering, University of Florida, Gainesville, FL, United States.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-1190-3729
François ModaveCenter for Health Outcomes and Informatics Research, Loyola University Chicago, Chicago, IL, United States.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0003-4366-0757
Electra PaskettDivision of Cancer Prevention and Control, Department of Internal Medicine, The Ohio State University, Columbus, OH, United States.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-8247-8299
Janice KriegerSTEM Translational Communication Center, University of Florida, Gainesville, FL, United States.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0001-9950-9170
University of Florida · USLoyola University Chicago · USNorth Carolina State University · USThe Ohio State University · USUniversity of Florida Health · US

Funding

Reporting Nutrition Risk Factors via Virtual Humans for Colorectal Cancer Prevention.R01CA207689 · NCI · UNIVERSITY OF FLORIDA · PI LOK, BENJAMIN, RAUP-KRIEGER, JANICE LEE · 2017 to 2021
$3.7M
Statistical methods for healthcare in complex patients with diabetesR01DK108073 · NIDDK · FRED HUTCHINSON CANCER RESEARCH CENTER · PI ZHAO, YINGQI · 2015 to 2019
$1.5M
NCI NIH HHS R01 CA207689NIDDK NIH HHS R01 DK108073
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundPatients are increasingly using mobile health (mHealth) apps to monitor their health and educate themselves about medical issues. Despite the increasing popularity of such apps, poor design and usability often lead to suboptimal continued use of these apps and subsequently to poor adherence to the behavior changes at which they are aimed. One solution to these design problems is for app developers to use user-centered design (UCD) principles to consider the context and needs of users during the development process.

objectiveThis study aimed to present a case study on the design and development process for an mHealth app that uses virtual human technology (VHT) to encourage colorectal cancer (CRC) screening among patients aged 50 years and above.

methodsWe have first provided an overview of the project and discussed its utilization of VHT. We have then reviewed UCD principles and how they can be incorporated into the development of health apps. We have described how we used UCD processes during the app's development. We have then discussed the unique roles played by communication researchers, computer scientists, clinicians, and community participants in creating an mHealth app that is credible, usable, effective, and accessible to its target audience.

resultsThe principles of UCD were woven throughout the project development, with researchers collecting feedback from patients and providers at all stages and using that feedback to improve the credibility, usability, effectiveness, and accessibility of the mHealth app. The app was designed in an iterative process, which encouraged feedback and improvement of the app and allowed teams from different fields to revisit topics and troubleshoot problems.

conclusionsImplementing a UCD process contributed to the development of an app, which not only reflected cross-disciplinary expertise but also the needs, wants, and concerns of patients.

Indexed as

cancer screeningcell phonecolon cancercommunicationculturally appropriate technologyinterdisciplinary researchmobile phone

Identifiers

PMID31066688
PMCPMC6530259
OpenAlexW2930205843

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.