Evidence map›Paper›PMID 31066678›Full record

ArticleJMIR cancer2019

Impact of a Mobilized Stress Management Program (Pep-Pal) for Caregivers of Oncology Patients: Mixed-Methods Study.

Alaina L Carr, Jacqueline Jones, Susan Mikulich Gilbertson, Mark L Laudenslager, Jean S Kutner, Kristin Kilbourn, Timothy S Sannes, Benjamin W Brewer, Elissa Kolva, Tanisha Joshi and 1 more

Registry-linked trialAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in JMIR cancer, 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to trial NCT03002896 (A Pilot Study of a Mobilized Psychoeducation and Skills Based Intervention), which is not on this map. Cited by 12 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
12citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

NCT03002896 nacompletednot on this map

A Pilot Study of a Mobilized Psychoeducation and Skills Based Intervention (Pep-Pal) for Caregivers of Patients With Advanced Illness

TypeinterventionalSponsorUniversity of Colorado, DenverRan2016 to 2018Enrolled69ConditionsDistress, Anxiety, DepressionArmsPep-Pal, Treatment as Usual
3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

12 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Article
  3. Technology-based applications for relatives and caregivers of people with advanced breast cancer-a scoping review.Supportive care in cancer : official journal of the Multinational Association of Supportive Care in Cancer · 2026
    Article
  4. Review
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Review
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

11 authors.

Alaina L CarrDepartment of Psychology, University of Colorado-Denver, Denver, CO, United States.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-9226-8439
Jacqueline JonesCollege of Nursing, University of Colorado Anschutz Medical Campus, Aurora, CO, United States.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0001-9714-995X
Susan Mikulich GilbertsonDepartment of Psychiatry, University of Colorado Anschutz Medical Campus, Aurora, CO, United States.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0001-9210-8884
Mark L LaudenslagerDepartment of Psychiatry, University of Colorado Anschutz Medical Campus, Aurora, CO, United States.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-9815-3026
Jean S KutnerDivision of General Internal Medicine, Department of Medicine, University of Colorado School of Medicine, Aurora, CO, United States.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-8079-831X
Kristin KilbournDepartment of Psychology, University of Colorado-Denver, Denver, CO, United States.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0001-7218-1988
Timothy S SannesDepartment of Psychiatry, University of Colorado Anschutz Medical Campus, Aurora, CO, United States.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0003-4479-0350
Benjamin W BrewerDivision of Hematology, Department of Medicine, University of Colorado Anschutz Medical Campus, Aurora, CO, United States.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-4449-8221
Elissa KolvaDivision of Medical Oncology, Department of Medicine, University of Colorado Anschutz Medical Campus, Aurora, CO, United States.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0003-0538-7585
Tanisha JoshiDivision of Hematology, Department of Medicine, University of Colorado Anschutz Medical Campus, Aurora, CO, United States.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0001-9631-532X
Nicole Amoyal PensakJersey Shore University Medical Center, Hackensack Meridian Health, Neptune, NJ, United States.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0003-2945-5255

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundCaregivers of patients with advanced diseases are known to have high levels of distress, including depression and anxiety. Recent research has focused on recognizing caregivers in need of psychosocial support to help them manage their distress. Evidenced-based technological interventions have the potential to aid caregivers in managing distress.

objectiveThe objective of our study was to describe caregiver perceptions of the usability and acceptability, and their suggestions for future adaptations, of a mobilized psychoeducation and skills-based intervention.

methodsThis study was a part of a larger trial of a mobilized psychoeducation and skills-based intervention (Psychoeducation and Skills-Based Mobilized Intervention [Pep-Pal]) for caregivers of patients with advanced illness. This substudy used a mixed-methods analysis of quantitative data from all 26 intervention participants and qualitative data from 14 intervention caregivers who completed the Pep-Pal intervention. The qualitative semistructured individual interviews, which we conducted within the first 4 weeks after participants completed the intervention, assessed the acceptability and usability of Pep-Pal. Additionally, the qualitative interviews provided contextual evidence of how the intervention was helpful to interviewees in unanticipated ways. We conducted applied thematic analysis via independent review of transcripts to extract salient themes.

resultsOverall, caregivers of patients with advanced cancer deemed Pep-Pal to be acceptable in all Web-based sessions except for Improving Intimacy. Caregivers perceived the program to be of use across the areas they needed and in others that they had not anticipated. Caregiver recommendations of key changes for the program were to include more variety in caregiver actors in sessions, change the title of Improving Intimacy to Improving Relationships, provide an audio-only option in addition to video, and change the format of the mobilized website program to a stand-alone mobile app.

conclusionsThe valuable feedback in key areas from individual interviews will be integrated into the final version of Pep-Pal that will be tested in a fully powered randomized clinical trial.

trial registrationClinicalTrials.gov NCT03002896; https://clinicaltrials.gov/ct2/show/NCT03002896 (Archived by WebCite at http://www.webcitation.org/76eThwaei).

Indexed as

advanced cancer caregiversbone marrow transplantationcancercaregiversclinical trial, phase IinternetmHealthneoplasmspsychoeducationqualitative researchrandomized controlled trialtelemedicine

Identifiers

PMID31066678
PMCPMC6524452

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.