Evidence map›Paper›PMID 31066455›Full record

ArticleAdvances in nutrition (Bethesda, Md.)2019

Milestones in DRI Development: What Does the Future Hold?

Ann L Yaktine, A Catharine Ross

Open access · bronzeAbstract readHistorical Article
In one paragraph

Article in Advances in nutrition (Bethesda, Md.), 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 5 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
5citing papers in PubMed
0.7field-weighted citation impact, top 24% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

5 citing papers in PubMed, 13 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Review
  4. Review
  5. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

Ann L YaktineFood and Nutrition Board, The National Academies of Sciences, Engineering, and Medicine, Washington, DC.
A Catharine RossDepartment of Nutritional Sciences, Pennsylvania State University, University Park, PA.
National Academies of Sciences, Engineering, and Medicine · USPennsylvania State University · US

Funding

VITAMIN A NUTRITIONAL STATUS AND IMMUNE FUNCTIONR01DK041479 · NIDDK · PENNSYLVANIA STATE UNIVERSITY-UNIV PARK · PI ROSS, A. CATHARINE · 1989 to 2015
$4.0M
Vitamin A Supplementation and Retinol Metabolism in the Neonatal PeriodR01HD066982 · NICHD · PENNSYLVANIA STATE UNIVERSITY, THE · PI ROSS, A. CATHARINE · 2010 to 2019
$2.9M
NICHD NIH HHS R01 HD066982NIDDK NIH HHS R01 DK041479
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The state of nutritional health in the United States in the early part of the twentieth century was very different from today. Nutrient deficiencies and dental caries were prevalent health concerns for many Americans. In 1940, the US National Defense Advisory Commission asked the National Academy of Sciences for help in studying problems of nutrition in the United States. The outcome was issuance of the first RDAs. The goal of the RDAs was to recommend "…allowances sufficiently liberal to be suitable for maintenance of good nutritional status." In the subsequent decades, a very different nutritional health challenge began to emerge for an increasing proportion of the population, that of overweight and obesity and risk of diet-related chronic disease. In part, as a response to this challenge, the RDA process was revised and the Dietary Reference Intakes (DRIs) were developed. The DRIs are a set of reference values that, when adhered to, predict a low probability of nutrient inadequacy or excessive intake. Recently, new DRI guidelines were proposed to define reference points for nutrient and food component intakes that influence risk of chronic disease. Developing DRIs for chronic disease endpoints presents unique challenges, notably, chronic diseases are multifactorial in nature and not directly nutrient-specific; the body of evidence supporting nutrients and other food substances as modifiers of risk of chronic disease is generally limited; and there is a lack of consistency in findings across study types. In addition, the latency of dietary exposures and chronic disease outcomes makes it difficult to demonstrate causality. Adapting the DRI model to meet the needs of the general population in the current context suggests a need to redefine the boundaries that describe the health of the population and to re-examine how indicators of chronic disease can be integrated effectively into the DRI process.

Indexed as

ForecastingChronic DiseaseDietHistory, 20th CenturyHistory, 21st CenturyHumansPopulation HealthRecommended Dietary AllowancesReference ValuesUnited Stateschronic diseasedietary reference intakesobesitypublic healthrecommended dietary allowance

Identifiers

PMID31066455
PMCPMC6520032
OpenAlexW2944797121

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.