Evidence map›Paper›PMID 31066345›Full record

ArticleGlobal health action2019

Can health promotion videos 'go viral'? A non-randomised, controlled, before-and-after pilot study to measure the spread and impact of local language mobile videos in Burkina Faso.

Tessa Swigart, Jennifer Hollowell, Pieter Remes, Matthew Lavoie, Joanna Murray, Mireille Belem, Rita Lamoukri, Souleymane Salouka, Kethakie Lamahewa, Roy Head

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Global health action, 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 5 papers, 2 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
5citing papers in PubMed, 2 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

5 citing papers in PubMed, 2 syntheses or guidelines pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Feasibility, acceptability, and appropriateness of themedRxiv : the preprint server for health sciences · 2025
    Article
  4. Article
  5. Public Health Directives in a Pandemic: Paradoxical Messages for Domestic Abuse Victims in Four Countries.International journal of environmental research and public health · 2022
    Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

10 authors.

Tessa Swigarta Development Media International , London , UK.
Jennifer Hollowella Development Media International , London , UK.ORCID 0000-0002-4041-5732
Pieter Remesb Development Media International , Ouagadougou , Burkina Faso.
Matthew Lavoieb Development Media International , Ouagadougou , Burkina Faso.
Joanna Murraya Development Media International , London , UK.
Mireille Belemb Development Media International , Ouagadougou , Burkina Faso.
Rita Lamoukrib Development Media International , Ouagadougou , Burkina Faso.
Souleymane Saloukab Development Media International , Ouagadougou , Burkina Faso.
Kethakie Lamahewaa Development Media International , London , UK.
Roy Heada Development Media International , London , UK.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundMobile phones present a new health communications opportunity but use of mobile videos warrants more exploration. Our study tested a new idea: to produce health promotion videos in languages for which films have never previously been produced to see if they were widely shared.

objectiveTo investigate whether the novelty of films in local languages focusing on health messages would be shared 'virally' among the target population.

methodsA non-randomised, controlled, before-and-after study was used to evaluate the reach and impact of the intervention. We gave short health promotion videos on memory cards to distributors in eight intervention villages. Ten control villages, where no video distribution took place were randomly selected. We conducted cluster-level difference-in-difference logistic regression to assess self-reported knowledge indicators. We calculated odds ratios for intervention relative to control at baseline and endline and p-values for the change in odds ratios.

resultsSeven hundred and eight mothers were interviewed across all villages at baseline and 728 different mothers and 726 men were interviewed in the same villages a year later in October 2015. At endline, 32% of women and 44% of men in the intervention arm had ever seen a film on a mobile phone in Lobiri, compared to 1% of women and 2% of men in the control arm. There was a significant increase in the odds of knowing about giving Orasel to a child with diarrhoea in the intervention area relative to the control area. Awareness of the need to take a child with fever or symptoms of pneumonia to a health centre increased in the intervention area, but not significantly.

conclusionsViral sharing of films on mobile phones has the potential to be an effective health promotion tool for communities whose languages are not served by existing mass media channels.

Indexed as

Attitude to ComputersAdultAgedAged, 80 and overBurkina FasoCell PhoneFathersFemaleHealth PromotionHumansMaleMiddle AgedMothersPilot ProjectsSocial MediaTranslationschild healthmass mediaMobile phonesruralvideos

Identifiers

PMID31066345
PMCPMC6508073

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.