Evidence map›Paper›PMID 31066137›Full record

ArticleAddiction biology2020

Brain responses to anticipating and receiving beer: Comparing light, at-risk, and dependent alcohol users.

Martine M Groefsema, Rutger C M E Engels, Valerie Voon, Arnt F A Schellekens, Maartje Luijten, Guillaume Sescousse

Open access · hybridAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Addiction biology, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 5 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
5citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
0.9field-weighted citation impact, top 32% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

5 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 13 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors at 4 institutions in 4 countries.

Martine M GroefsemaExecutive Board, Radboud University, Behavioural Science Institute, Nijmegen, The Netherlands.ORCID 0000-0001-6399-4880
Rutger C M E EngelsExecutive Board, Erasmus University, Rotterdam, The Netherlands.
Valerie VoonCambridge University, Behavioural and Clinical Neuroscience Institute, Cambridge, United Kingdom.
Arnt F A SchellekensRadboud University, RadboudUMC, Nijmegen, The Netherlands.
Maartje LuijtenExecutive Board, Radboud University, Behavioural Science Institute, Nijmegen, The Netherlands.
Guillaume SescousseRadboud University, Donders Institute for Brain, Cognition and Behaviour, Nijmegen, The Netherlands.
Radboud University Nijmegen · NLCentre National de la Recherche Scientifique · FRErasmus University Rotterdam · NLUniversity of Cambridge · GB

Funding

Medical Research Council MR/P008747/1
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Impaired brain processing of alcohol-related rewards has been suggested to play a central role in alcohol use disorder. Yet, evidence remains inconsistent and mainly originates from studies in which participants passively observe alcohol cues or taste alcohol. Here, we designed a protocol in which beer consumption was predicted by incentive cues and contingent on instrumental action closer to real life situations. We predicted that anticipating and receiving beer (compared with water) would elicit activity in the brain reward network and that this activity would correlate with drinking level across participants. The sample consisted of 150 beer-drinking males, aged 18 to 25 years. Three groups were defined based on alcohol use disorders identification test (AUDIT) scores: light drinkers (n = 39), at-risk drinkers (n = 64), and dependent drinkers (n = 47). fMRI measures were obtained while participants engaged in the beer incentive delay task involving beer- and water-predicting cues followed by real sips of beer or water. During anticipation, outcome notification and delivery of beer compared with water, higher activity was found in a reward-related brain network including the dorsal medial prefrontal cortex, orbitofrontal cortex, and amygdala. Yet, no activity was observed in the striatum, and no differences were found between the groups. Our results reveal that anticipating, obtaining, and tasting beer activates parts of the brain reward network, but that these brain responses do not differentiate between different drinking levels.

Indexed as

BeerMotivationRewardAdolescentAlcohol DrinkingAlcoholismAmygdalaAnticipation, PsychologicalBrainCorpus StriatumCuesDrinking WaterFunctional NeuroimagingHumansMagnetic Resonance ImagingMaleDrinking Wateralcoholbrainreward

Identifiers

PMID31066137
PMCPMC7187239
OpenAlexW2950787594

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.