ArticleHuman mutation2019
CAGI experiments: Modeling sequence variant impact on gene splicing using predictions from computational tools.
Article in Human mutation, 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
3 citing papers in PubMed.
- Genome-wide functional annotation and interpretation of splicing variants: toward RNA-targeted therapies.Journal of human genetics · 2025Review
- CAGI, the Critical Assessment of Genome Interpretation, establishes progress and prospects for computational genetic variant interpretation methods.Genome biology · 2024Article
- Reports from the fifth edition of CAGI: The Critical Assessment of Genome Interpretation.Human mutation · 2019Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Improving predictions of phenotypic consequences for genomic variants is part of ongoing efforts in the scientific community to gain meaningful insights into genomic function. Within the framework of the critical assessment of genome interpretation experiments, we participated in the Vex-seq challenge, which required predicting the change in the percent spliced in measure (ΔΨ) for 58 exons caused by more than 1,000 genomic variants. Experimentally determined through the Vex-seq assay, the Ψ quantifies the fraction of reads that include an exon of interest. Predicting the change in Ψ associated with specific genomic variants implies determining the sequence changes relevant for splicing regulators, such as splicing enhancers and silencers. Here we took advantage of two computational tools, SplicePort and SPANR, that incorporate relevant sequence features in their models of splice sites and exon-inclusion level, respectively. Specifically, we used the SplicePort and SPANR outputs to build mathematical models of the experimental data obtained for the variants in the training set, which we then used to predict the ΔΨ associated with the mutations in the test set. We show that the sequence changes captured by these computational tools provide a reasonable foundation for modeling the impact on splicing associated with genomic variants.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.