Evidence map›Paper›PMID 31066108›Full record

ArticleAddiction (Abingdon, England)2019

Negative marijuana-related consequences among college students in five countries: measurement invariance of the Brief Marijuana Consequences Questionnaire.

Adrian J Bravo, Matthew R Pearson, Angelina Pilatti, Laura Mezquita, Cross-Cultural Addictions Study Team

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Addiction (Abingdon, England), 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 27 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
27citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

27 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.

  1. A meta-analytic investigation of the associations between cannabis use and cannabis-related negative consequences.Psychology of addictive behaviors : journal of the Society of Psychologists in Addictive Behaviors · 2019
    Pooled it
  2. Article
  3. Identifying themes of protective behavioral strategies for marijuana use with structural topic modeling.Psychology of addictive behaviors : journal of the Society of Psychologists in Addictive Behaviors · 2026
    Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Review
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors.

Adrian J BravoCenter on Alcoholism, Substance Abuse, and Addictions, University of New Mexico, NM, USA.ORCID 0000-0002-4630-6449
Matthew R PearsonCenter on Alcoholism, Substance Abuse, and Addictions, University of New Mexico, NM, USA.ORCID 0000-0003-3772-0186
Angelina PilattiUniversidad Nacional de Córdoba, Facultad de Psicología, Instituto de Investigaciones Psicológicas, IIPsi-CONICET-UNC, Córdoba, Argentina.
Laura MezquitaDepartment of Basic and Clinical Psychology and Psychobiology, Universitat Jaume I, Castelló, Castellón, Spain.ORCID 0000-0001-6042-599X
Cross-Cultural Addictions Study Team

Funding

Alcohol Research Training: Methods & MechanismsT32AA018108 · NIAAA · UNIVERSITY OF NEW MEXICO · PI Katie A Witkiewitz · 2010 to 2026
$5.6M
Efficacy and neurobiological mechanisms of mobile-delivered cognitive retrainingK01AA023233 · NIAAA · UNIVERSITY OF NEW MEXICO · PI PEARSON, MATTHEW RYAN · 2014 to 2018
$832k
National Secretary of Science and Technology PICT 2015-849NIAAA NIH HHS K01 AA023233NIAAA NIH HHS T32 AA018108Science and Technology- National University of CórdobaSpanish Ministry of Economy and Competitiveness PSI2015-67766-RUniversitat Jaume I UJI-A2017-18Universitat Jaume I UJI-B2017-74
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

BACKGROUND AND

aimsThe 21-item Brief Marijuana Consequences Questionnaire (B-MACQ) has been shown to be a valid measure to assess negative marijuana-related consequences among US college students. The present study aimed to: (a) examine measurement invariance of the B-MACQ among college student marijuana users in five countries, (b) evaluate latent mean differences on the B-MACQ as a function of sex and country if invariance is met and (c) compare criterion-related validity across different countries and sex.

designInstrumental study.

settingArgentina, the Netherlands, Spain, Uruguay and United States.

participantsA subsample of last-month marijuana users who completed the B-MACQ (n = 1145; 62.9% female). MEASUREMENTS: The B-MACQ, several dimensions of marijuana use and perceptions of marijuana use.

findingsResults supported configural and scalar invariance (all ΔCFI/TLI ≤ 0.01; ΔRMSEA ≤ 0.015) of a 20-item B-MACQ across sex and four countries (the Netherlands being the exception). In examining latent mean differences, Spanish students reported a higher number of consequences than US (P < 0.001) and Argentinian students (P = 0.003). In examining criterion-related validity, marijuana use indicators (0.01 < rs < 0.64), descriptive norms (0.04 < rs < 0.49) and injunctive norms for best friend (0.06 < rs < 0.28) largely had small-to-moderate positive correlations with negative marijuana-related consequences.

conclusionsThe 20-item B-MACQ accurately assesses marijuana-related negative consequences among male and female college student marijuana users across the United States, Argentina, Spain and Uruguay. The B-MACQ could be used effectively to identify marijuana-related consequences in college students from different countries or cultures.

Indexed as

AdolescentAdultArgentinaFemaleHumansMaleMarijuana UseNetherlandsPsychometricsReproducibility of ResultsSpainStudentsSurveys and QuestionnairesUnited StatesUniversitiesUruguayCannabis usecollege studentscross-culturalmarijuana-related consequencesmarijuana usemeasurement invariance

Identifiers

PMID31066108
PMCPMC6732001

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.