Evidence map›Paper›PMID 31066013›Full record

Trial reportJournal of gastrointestinal surgery : official journal of the Society for Surgery of the Alimentary Tract2020

A Multicenter, Randomized, Open-Label Study to Compare Micafungin with Fluconazole in the Prophylaxis of Invasive Fungal Infections in Living-Donor Liver Transplant Recipients.

Woo-Hyoung Kang, Gi-Won Song, Sung-Gyu Lee, Kyung-Suk Suh, Kwang-Woong Lee, Nam-Joon Yi, Jae Won Joh, Choon Hyuck David Kwon, Jong Man Kim, Dong Lak Choi and 2 more

Registry-linked trialOpen access · greenAbstract readMulticenter StudyRandomized Controlled TrialEquivalence Trial
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Trial report in Journal of gastrointestinal surgery : official journal of the Society for Surgery of the Alimentary Tract, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to trial NCT01974375 (Randomized, Open Label, Non-inferiority Study of Micafungin Versus Fluconazole for the Korean Prevention of Invasive Fungal Disease in Living Donor Liver Transplant Recipients), which is not on this map. Cited by 14 papers, 3 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
14citing papers in PubMed, 3 pooled it
1.9field-weighted citation impact, top 15% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

NCT01974375 phase3unknown statusnot on this map

Randomized, Open Label, Non-inferiority Study of Micafungin Versus Fluconazole for the Korean Prevention of Invasive Fungal Disease in Living Donor Liver Transplant Recipients

TypeinterventionalSponsorAsan Medical CenterRan2012 to 2014Enrolled172ConditionsLiver Transplant RecipientArmsmicafungin, Fluconazole
3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

14 citing papers in PubMed, 3 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 26 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Guideline
  2. Pooled it
  3. Pooled it
  4. Article
  5. Review
  6. Article
  7. Review
  8. Article
  9. Review
  10. [Consensus on diagnosis and treatment of invasive fungal infection in patients with severe liver disease].Zhonghua gan zang bing za zhi = Zhonghua ganzangbing zazhi = Chinese journal of hepatology · 2022
    Article
  11. Fungal infections following liver transplantation.World journal of hepatology · 2021
    Review
  12. Fungal Infections in Liver Transplant Recipients.Journal of fungi (Basel, Switzerland) · 2021
    Review
  13. Review
  14. Risk factors associated with invasive fungal disease post-liver transplantation.The Brazilian journal of infectious diseases : an official publication of the Brazilian Society of Infectious Diseases
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

12 authors at 7 institutions in 2 countries.

Woo-Hyoung KangDivision of Liver Transplantation and Hepatobiliary Surgery, Department of Surgery, Asan Medical Center, College of Medicine, University of Ulsan, Seoul, South Korea.
Gi-Won SongDivision of Liver Transplantation and Hepatobiliary Surgery, Department of Surgery, Asan Medical Center, College of Medicine, University of Ulsan, Seoul, South Korea. drsong71@amc.seoul.kr.
Sung-Gyu LeeDivision of Liver Transplantation and Hepatobiliary Surgery, Department of Surgery, Asan Medical Center, College of Medicine, University of Ulsan, Seoul, South Korea.
Kyung-Suk SuhDepartment of Surgery, College of Medicine, Seoul National University, Seoul, South Korea.
Kwang-Woong LeeDepartment of Surgery, College of Medicine, Seoul National University, Seoul, South Korea.
Nam-Joon YiDepartment of Surgery, College of Medicine, Seoul National University, Seoul, South Korea.
Jae Won JohDepartment of Surgery, Samsung Medical Center, School of Medicine, Sungkyunkwan University, Seoul, South Korea.
Choon Hyuck David KwonDepartment of Surgery and Digestive Disease Institute, Cleveland Clinic, Cleveland Clinic Lerner College of Medicine, Cleveland, OH, USA.
Jong Man KimDepartment of Surgery, Samsung Medical Center, School of Medicine, Sungkyunkwan University, Seoul, South Korea.
Dong Lak ChoiDepartment of Surgery, College of Medicine, Catholic University of Daegu, Daegu, South Korea.
Joo Dong KimDepartment of Surgery, College of Medicine, Catholic University of Daegu, Daegu, South Korea.
Myoung Soo KimDepartment of Surgery, College of Medicine, Yonsei University, Seoul, South Korea.
Seoul National University · KRCatholic University of Daegu · KRSamsung Medical Center · KRUniversity of Ulsan · KRAsan Medical Center · KRCleveland Clinic Lerner College of Medicine · USYonsei University · KR

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundAlthough invasive fungal infections (IFIs) contribute to substantial morbidity and mortality in liver transplant recipients, only a few randomized studies analyzed the results of antifungal prophylaxis with echinocandins. The aim of this open-label, non-inferiority study was to evaluate the efficacy and safety of micafungin in the prophylaxis of IFIs in living-donor liver transplantation recipients (LDLTRs), with fluconazole as the comparator.

methodsLDLTRs (N = 172) from five centers were randomized 1:1 to receive intravenous micafungin 100 mg/day or fluconazole 100~200 mg/day (intravenous or oral). A non-inferiority of micafungin was tested against fluconazole.

resultsThe per-protocol set included 144 patients without major clinical trial protocol violations: 69 from the micafungin group and 75 from the fluconazole group. Mean age of the study patients was 54.2 years and mean model for end-stage liver disease (MELD) score amounted to 16.5. Clinical success rates in the micafungin and fluconazole groups were 95.65% and 96.10%, respectively (difference: - 0.45%; 90% confidence interval [CI]: - 6.93%, 5.59%), which demonstrated micafungin's non-inferiority (the lower bound for the 90% CI exceeded - 10%). The study groups did not differ significantly in terms of the secondary efficacy endpoints: absence of IFIs at the end of the prophylaxis and the end of the study, time to proven IFI, fungal-free survival, and adverse reactions. A total of 17 drug-related adverse events were observed in both groups; none of them was serious and all resolved.

conclusionMicafungin can be used as an alternative to fluconazole in the prevention of IFIs in LDLTRs. CLINICAL TRIALS REGISTRATION: NCT01974375.

Indexed as

End Stage Liver DiseaseHematopoietic Stem Cell TransplantationInvasive Fungal InfectionsLiver TransplantationMycosesAntifungal AgentsFluconazoleHumansLipopeptidesLiving DonorsMicafunginMiddle AgedSeverity of Illness IndexAntifungal AgentsFluconazoleLipopeptidesMicafunginFluconazoleLiving donor liver transplantationMicafunginProphylaxis of invasive fungal infection

Identifiers

PMID31066013
OpenAlexW2944044619

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.