Evidence map›Paper›PMID 31065955›Full record

SynthesisMusculoskeletal surgery2020

Incidence, diagnosis and management of sacroiliitis after spinal surgery: a systematic review of the literature.

G Colò, L Cavagnaro, M Alessio-Mazzola, A Zanirato, L Felli, M Formica

Abstract readSystematic Review
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Synthesis in Musculoskeletal surgery, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 14 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
14citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
2.9field-weighted citation impact, top 9% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

14 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 24 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Review
  6. Impact of diagnosis and type of sacroiliac joint fusion on postoperative complications.European spine journal : official publication of the European Spine Society, the European Spinal Deformity Society, and the European Section of the Cervical Spine Research Society · 2022
    Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Review
  11. Article
  12. Review
  13. Article
  14. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

G ColòClinica Ortopedica - IRCCS Ospedale Policlinico San Martino, Università di Genova, Largo Rosanna Benzi, 10, 16132, Genoa, GE, Italy. gabriele.colo@yahoo.it.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-6838-6910
L CavagnaroOrtopedia e Traumatologia 2 - Joint Replacement Unit - Ospedale Santa Corona, Viale 25 Aprile, 38, 17027, Pietra Ligure, SV, Italy.
M Alessio-MazzolaClinica Ortopedica - IRCCS Ospedale Policlinico San Martino, Università di Genova, Largo Rosanna Benzi, 10, 16132, Genoa, GE, Italy.
A ZaniratoClinica Ortopedica - IRCCS Ospedale Policlinico San Martino, Università di Genova, Largo Rosanna Benzi, 10, 16132, Genoa, GE, Italy.
L FelliClinica Ortopedica - IRCCS Ospedale Policlinico San Martino, Università di Genova, Largo Rosanna Benzi, 10, 16132, Genoa, GE, Italy.
M FormicaClinica Ortopedica - IRCCS Ospedale Policlinico San Martino, Università di Genova, Largo Rosanna Benzi, 10, 16132, Genoa, GE, Italy.
Ospedale Policlinico San Martino · ITOspedale Santa Corona · IT

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The sacroiliac joint (SIJ) is a possible source of persistent or new onset pain after lumbar or lumbosacral fusion. The aim of this paper is to systematically review and analyze the available literature related to the incidence, diagnosis and management of sacroiliitis after spinal arthrodesis. The authors independently screened the titles and abstracts of all articles identified concerning sacroiliac joint pain after lumbar or lumbosacral fusion, to assess their suitability to the research focus. The average incidence of sacroiliitis after lumbar or lumbosacral arthrodesis was found to be 37 ± 28.48 (range 6-75), increasing directly to the number of fused segments involved, especially when the sacrum is included. The most accurate evaluation is the image-guided injection of anesthetic solutions in the joint. Surgery treatment may be considered when conservative therapy fails, with open surgery or with minimally invasive SIJ fusion. Although the risk of developing SIJ degeneration is unclear, the results indicate that pain and degeneration of SIJ develop more often in patients undergoing lumbosacral fusion regardless of the number of melting segments. The treatment of sacroiliitis appears to be independent of his etiology, with or without previous instrumentation on several levels.

Indexed as

Spinal FusionAdolescentAdultAgedAged, 80 and overAnesthetics, LocalArthrodesisChildFailed Back Surgery SyndromeFemaleHumansIncidenceInjections, Intra-ArticularLumbar VertebraeMaleMiddle AgedAnesthetics, LocalDegenerationLumbar fusionLumbosacral fusionPostoperative sacroiliac joint painSacroiliac joint

Identifiers

PMID31065955
OpenAlexW2943838546

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.