Evidence map›Paper›PMID 31065897›Full record

ArticleDigestive diseases and sciences2019

Antibiotics Do Not Decrease the Rate of Infection After Endoscopic Ultrasound Fine-Needle Aspiration of Pancreatic Cysts.

Antonio Facciorusso, Vincenzo Rosario Buccino, Antonio Turco, Matteo Antonino, Nicola Muscatiello

Registry-linked trialAbstract readComparative Study
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Article in Digestive diseases and sciences, 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to trial NCT06535490 (Prevention of Infection After EUS-FNA of Pancreatic Cystic Lesions), which is not on this map. Cited by 13 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
13citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
1.9field-weighted citation impact, top 12% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

NCT06535490 not yet recruitingnot on this mapstarted 2024, after this paper: background citation

Prevention of Infection After EUS-FNA of Pancreatic Cystic Lesions: A French Multicenter Prospective Comparative Observational Study

TypeobservationalSponsorSociété Française d'Endoscopie DigestiveRan2024 to 2027Enrolled1,702ConditionsPancreatic Cystic LesionArmsEUS-FNA, ATBp
3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

13 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 27 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Trial
  3. Review
  4. Review
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Review
  13. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Antonio FacciorussoGastroenterology Unit, Department of Medical Sciences, University of Foggia, AOU Ospedali Riuniti, Viale Pinto, 1, 71100, Foggia, Italy. antonio.facciorusso@virgilio.it.ORCID 0000-0002-2107-2156
Vincenzo Rosario BuccinoGastroenterology Unit, Department of Medical Sciences, University of Foggia, AOU Ospedali Riuniti, Viale Pinto, 1, 71100, Foggia, Italy.
Antonio TurcoGastroenterology Unit, Department of Medical Sciences, University of Foggia, AOU Ospedali Riuniti, Viale Pinto, 1, 71100, Foggia, Italy.
Matteo AntoninoGastroenterology Unit, Department of Medical Sciences, University of Foggia, AOU Ospedali Riuniti, Viale Pinto, 1, 71100, Foggia, Italy.
Nicola MuscatielloGastroenterology Unit, Department of Medical Sciences, University of Foggia, AOU Ospedali Riuniti, Viale Pinto, 1, 71100, Foggia, Italy.
University of Foggia · IT

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundIn spite of the weak evidence, antibiotic prophylaxis prior to endoscopic ultrasound-guided fine-needle aspiration of pancreatic cystic lesions is routinely used in the clinical practice.

aimsTo compare a group of patients treated with antibiotics before fine-needle aspiration of pancreatic cystic lesions and a group who did not undergo antimicrobial prophylaxis.

methodsOut of 335 patients with suspected pancreatic cystic lesions referred to our center between 2006 and 2018, after propensity score matching two groups were compared: 135 subjects who underwent endoscopic ultrasound fine-needle aspiration under antibiotic prophylaxis and 135 treated with no antimicrobial agents. Primary outcome was infection rate; secondary endpoints included other complications or antibiotic-related adverse events.

resultsMedian age was 64 (interquartile range 61-68) and median cyst size was 24 mm (22-28), with no difference between groups. Overall, 10 adverse events (7.1%) of which 2 serious (1.4%) were observed in the antibiotic group and 8 (5.8%) of which 1 (0.7%) serious in the non-antibiotic group. Cyst infection was observed in 2 patients (1.4%) in the antibiotic group and 3 patients (2.2%) in the other cohort (p = 0.65).

conclusionsProphylactic antibiotics do not seem to substantially reduce this risk of infection, and their routine use should be abandoned.

Indexed as

Antibiotic ProphylaxisAgedAged, 80 and overBacterial InfectionsDatabases, FactualEndoscopic Ultrasound-Guided Fine Needle AspirationFemaleHumansMaleMiddle AgedPancreatic CystRetrospective StudiesRisk AssessmentRisk FactorsUnnecessary ProceduresEndoscopic ultrasoundFNALesionPancreas

Identifiers

PMID31065897
OpenAlexW2944103162

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.