ArticleEuropean journal of pediatrics2019
Comparison of cranial ultrasound and MRI for detecting BRAIN injury in extremely preterm infants and correlation with neurological outcomes at 1 and 3 years.
Article in European journal of pediatrics, 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 18 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
18 citing papers in PubMed, 36 citations in OpenAlex.
- Family social risks on neurodevelopmental outcomes in preterm infants without severe brain injury.Pediatric research · 2026Article
- Three-Domain Serial Cranial Ultrasound Phenotypes and Outcomes in Very Preterm Infants with Severe Brain Injury: A Single-Center Cohort Study.Children (Basel, Switzerland) · 2026Article
- Early ultrasound-based assessment of preterm white matter injury: association with MRI and neurological outcomes.Pediatric radiology · 2026Article
- The relationship between sonographically assessed volumetric brain development in VLBW preterm infants and neurodevelopmental outcome at 2 years of age-data from the NeoNEVS project.Frontiers in pediatrics · 2026Article
- Experience with new technology: Point-of-care magnetic resonance imaging in the neonatal intensive care unit.Journal of clinical imaging science · 2026Article
- Beyond hearing loss: exploring neurological and neurodevelopmental sequelae in asymptomatic congenital cytomegalovirus infection.Pediatric research · 2025Review
- Imaging biomarkers for detection and longitudinal monitoring of ventricular abnormalities from birth to childhood.World journal of radiology · 2025Review
- Can deep learning classify cerebral ultrasound images for the detection of brain injury in very preterm infants?European radiology · 2025Article
- Predictive value of transcranial Doppler ultrasound for brain development and craniocerebral injury in premature infants.American journal of translational research · 2025Article
- Deep Learning Approaches for the Assessment of Germinal Matrix Hemorrhage Using Neonatal Head Ultrasound.Sensors (Basel, Switzerland) · 2024Article
- Neurosonography: Shaping the future of neuroprotection strategies in extremely preterm infants.Heliyon · 2024Review
- Evaluation of Severe ultrasound and gene diagnosis in cardiac index and shock patient index of shock patients.Technology and health care : official journal of the European Society for Engineering and Medicine · 2024Article
- Practical Stepwise Approach to Performing Neonatal Brain MR Imaging in the Research Setting.Children (Basel, Switzerland) · 2023Article
- Early spectral EEG in preterm infants correlates with neurocognitive outcomes in late childhood.Pediatric research · 2022Observational
- Neuroimaging at Term Equivalent Age: Is There Value for the Preterm Infant? A Narrative Summary.Children (Basel, Switzerland) · 2021Review
- Consensus Approach for Standardizing the Screening and Classification of Preterm Brain Injury Diagnosed With Cranial Ultrasound: A Canadian Perspective.Frontiers in pediatrics · 2021Article
- Ultrasonographic Estimation of Total Brain Volume: 3D Reliability and 2D Estimation. Enabling Routine Estimation During NICU Admission in the Preterm Infant.Frontiers in pediatrics · 2021Article
- Neurodevelopmental disorders: 2021 update.Free neuropathology · 2021Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
This study aimed to investigate the accuracy of different grades of brain injuries on serial and term equivalent age (TEA)-cranial ultrasound imaging (cUS) as compared to TEA magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) in extremely preterm infants < 28 weeks, and determine the predictive value of imaging abnormalities on neurodevelopmental outcome at 1 and 3 years. Seventy-five infants were included in the study. Severe TEA-cUS injury had high positive predictive value-PPV (100%) for predicting severe MRI injury compared to mild to moderate TEA-cUS injury or severe injury on worst cranial ultrasound scan. Absence of moderate to severe injury on TEA cUS or worst serial cUS was a good predictor of a normal MRI (negative predictive values > 93%). Severe grade 3 injuries on TEA-US had high predictive values in predicting abnormal neurodevelopment at both 1 and 3 years of age (PPV 100%). All grades of MRI and worst serial cUS injuries poorly predicted abnormal neurodevelopment at 1 and 3 years. Absence of an injury either on a cranial ultrasound or an MRI did not predict a normal outcome. Multiple logistic regression did not show a significant correlation between imaging injury and neurodevelopmental outcomes.Conclusion: This study demonstrates that TEA cUS can reliably identify severe brain abnormalities that would be seen on MRI imaging and positively predict abnormal neurodevelopment at both 1 and 3 years. Although MRI can pick up more subtle abnormalities that may be missed on cUS, their predictive value on neurodevelopmental impairment is poor. Normal cUS and MRI scan may not exclude abnormal neurodevelopment. Routine TEA-MRI scan provides limited benefit in predicting abnormal neurodevelopment in extremely preterm infants. What is Known: • Preterm neonates are at increased risk of white matter and other brain injuries, which may be associated with adverse neurodevelopmental outcome. • MRI is the most accurate method in detecting white matter injuries. What is New: • TEA-cUS can reliably detect severe brain injuries on MRI, but not mild/moderate lesions as well as abnormal neurodevelopment at 1 and 3 years. • TEA-MRI brain injury is poor in predicting abnormal neurodevelopment at 1 and 3 years and normal cUS or MRI brain injury may not guarantee normal neurodevelopment.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.