ArticleEuropean spine journal : official publication of the European Spine Society, the European Spinal Deformity Society, and the European Section of the Cervical Spine Research Society2019
Treatments and outcomes of spinal metastasis from thymic epithelial tumors: 10-year experience with 15 patients in a single center.
Article in European spine journal : official publication of the European Spine Society, the European Spinal Deformity Society, and the European Section of the Cervical Spine Research Society, 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
2 citing papers in PubMed, 5 citations in OpenAlex.
- Clinical outcomes of the LORDS strategy for thoracolumbar spinal metastases: a retrospective cohort study.European spine journal : official publication of the European Spine Society, the European Spinal Deformity Society, and the European Section of the Cervical Spine Research Society · 2026Article
- Maximal feasible resection versus hybrid therapy in spinal metastases: an updated narrative review.World journal of surgical oncology · 2025Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
8 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.
Funding
Abstract
purposeAlthough thymic epithelial tumors (TETs) are rare, their spinal metastases are even rarer, and they have only been described in a few case reports. The aim of the present study is to discuss the possible treatments and outcomes of patients with spinal metastasis from TETs.
methodsIncluded in this retrospective study were 15 patients with metastasis of TETs who received either radical or debulking surgery plus radiochemotherapy as adjuvant therapy in our center between 2007 and 2017. Possible prognostic factors for progression-free survival (PFS) and overall survival (OS) were analyzed by log-rank analysis.
resultsOur series comprised seven men and eight women, with a median age of 52 years. The period from the primary diagnosis to spinal metastasis varied from 0 to 16 months. The metastatic lesions were mainly located in the thoracic spine (n = 11; 73.3%), followed by the cervical and lumbar spine (n = 2; 13.3%, respectively). The median follow-up period was 28 months. Local tumor progression was detected in four patients (26.7%), and seven patients (46.7%) died of the disease during the follow-up period. Log-rank analysis indicated that radical resection was associated with longer PFS, whereas PFS, response to systemic chemotherapy and WHO B1-B2 were favorable factors of OS for patients with spinal metastatic TETs.
conclusionsRadical surgery is associated with longer PFS, while PFS is associated with better OS. Postoperative radiotherapy seems to be a useful supplementary treatment after debulking surgery, and patients who respond to postoperative chemotherapy were demonstrated with greater OS. WHO type B3-C seemed to be an adverse factor for spinal metastasis from TETs. These slides can be retrieved under Electronic Supplementary Material.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.