ArticleInternational orthopaedics2019
Surgeons and robots.
Article in International orthopaedics, 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 12 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
12 citing papers in PubMed.
- Comparison of freehand technique and a novel laser guiding navigation in distal locking of femoral intramedullary nails: a randomized controlled trial.BMC surgery · 2022Trial
- Bioethics in the era of digital surgery: artificial intelligence, robotics, telesurgery and the surgical black box: who owns the mistakes? Who owns my health data?International orthopaedics · 2026Article
- The art of orthopaedic publishing: a journey through the author-editor-publisher dynamic.International orthopaedics · 2024Article
- The disparity is a more significant challenge for orthopaedic surgeons than the planet's population growth.International orthopaedics · 2024Article
- Artificial intelligence, natural stupidity or artificial stupidity: who is today the winner in orthopaedics? What is true and what is fraud? What legal barriers exist for scientific writing?International orthopaedics · 2024Article
- Thoughts on artificial intelligence use in medical practice and in scientific writing.International orthopaedics · 2023Article
- Robotic-assisted revision total joint arthroplasty: a state-of-the-art scoping review.EFORT open reviews · 2023Article
- The editor endeavours, aims and standards in a surgery journal: our experience with "International Orthopaedics" and the Société Internationale de Chirurgie Orthopédique et de Traumatologie publications.International orthopaedics · 2022Article
- Maintaining education, research and innovation in orthopaedic surgery during the COVID-19 pandemic. The role of virtual platforms. From presential to virtual, front and side effects of the pandemic.International orthopaedics · 2020Article
- Useful and useless publications measured by bibliometrics and scientometrics in orthopaedic surgery. Are the relevance of a journal and publication metrics useful enough for the scientific promotion of surgeons?International orthopaedics · 2020Article
- New perspectives on surgical accuracy analysis of image-guided bone tumour resection surgery.International orthopaedics · 2020Article
- The acceptance of robots in the orthopedic joint replacement operating room.Canadian journal of surgery. Journal canadien de chirurgieArticle
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
2 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
PubMed holds no abstract for this paper.
Identifiers
31065767What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.