Evidence map›Paper›PMID 31065514›Full record

ArticleAdvanced science (Weinheim, Baden-Wurttemberg, Germany)2019

Deep Learning Spectroscopy: Neural Networks for Molecular Excitation Spectra.

Kunal Ghosh, Annika Stuke, Milica Todorović, Peter Bjørn Jørgensen, Mikkel N Schmidt, Aki Vehtari, Patrick Rinke

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Advanced science (Weinheim, Baden-Wurttemberg, Germany), 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 64 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
64citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

64 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Review
  5. Article
  6. ML Workflows for Screening Degradation-Relevant Properties of Forever Chemicals.Advanced science (Weinheim, Baden-Wurttemberg, Germany) · 2026
    Article
  7. Review
  8. Review
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article

4 more citing papers are in PubMed but not listed here.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors.

Kunal GhoshDepartment of Computer Science Aalto University P.O. Box 15400 Aalto FI-00076 Finland.
Annika StukeDepartment of Applied Physics Aalto University P.O. Box 11100 Aalto FI-00076 Finland.
Milica TodorovićDepartment of Applied Physics Aalto University P.O. Box 11100 Aalto FI-00076 Finland.
Peter Bjørn JørgensenDepartment of Applied Mathematics and Computer Science Technical University of Denmark Richard Petersens Plads, 2800 Kgs. Lyngby Denmark.
Mikkel N SchmidtDepartment of Applied Mathematics and Computer Science Technical University of Denmark Richard Petersens Plads, 2800 Kgs. Lyngby Denmark.
Aki VehtariDepartment of Computer Science Aalto University P.O. Box 15400 Aalto FI-00076 Finland.
Patrick RinkeDepartment of Applied Physics Aalto University P.O. Box 11100 Aalto FI-00076 Finland.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0003-1898-723X

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Deep learning methods for the prediction of molecular excitation spectra are presented. For the example of the electronic density of states of 132k organic molecules, three different neural network architectures: multilayer perceptron (MLP), convolutional neural network (CNN), and deep tensor neural network (DTNN) are trained and assessed. The inputs for the neural networks are the coordinates and charges of the constituent atoms of each molecule. Already, the MLP is able to learn spectra, but the root mean square error (RMSE) is still as high as 0.3 eV. The learning quality improves significantly for the CNN (RMSE = 0.23 eV) and reaches its best performance for the DTNN (RMSE = 0.19 eV). Both CNN and DTNN capture even small nuances in the spectral shape. In a showcase application of this method, the structures of 10k previously unseen organic molecules are scanned and instant spectra predictions are obtained to identify molecules for potential applications.

Indexed as

artificial intelligenceDFT calculationsexcitation spectraneural networksorganic molecules

Identifiers

PMID31065514
PMCPMC6498126

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.