Scattering-independent glucose absorption measurement using a spectrally resolved reflectance setup with specialized variable source-detector separations.

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

Who cites it

3 citing papers in PubMed.

1. FF-ViT: probe orientation regression for robot-assisted endomicroscopy tissue scanning.International journal of computer assisted radiology and surgery · 2024
   Article
2. Machine Learning Method and Hyperspectral Imaging for Precise Determination of Glucose and Silicon Levels.Sensors (Basel, Switzerland) · 2024
   Article
3. Specialized source-detector separations in near-infrared reflectance spectroscopy platform enable effective separation of diffusion and absorption for glucose sensing.Biomedical optics express · 2019
   Article

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

Authors and funding

4 authors.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

Abstract