Evidence map›Paper›PMID 31065392›Full record

ArticleCase reports in obstetrics and gynecology2019

Refractory Sexual Arousal Subsequent to Sacral Neuromodulation.

Dani Zoorob, Amanda S Deis, Kathryn Lindsay

Open access · goldAbstract readCase Reports
In one paragraph

Article in Case reports in obstetrics and gynecology, 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed
0.5field-weighted citation impact, top 35% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed, 9 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors at 3 institutions in 1 country.

Dani ZoorobDepartment of Obstetrics and Gynecology, University of Toledo, 2142 N. Cove Blvd., Toledo OH 43606, USA.ORCID 0000-0002-6471-1528
Amanda S DeisDepartment of Anesthesiology and Perioperative Medicine, University of Pittsburg, A-1305 Scaife Hall, 3550 Terrace Street, Pittsburgh, PA 15261, USA.ORCID 0000-0002-4772-6381
Kathryn LindsayDepartment of Obstetrics and Gynecology, University of Oklahoma, 825 NE 10th St, Oklahoma City, OK 73104, USA.ORCID 0000-0002-4434-5583
Pittsburg State University · USUniversity of Oklahoma · USUniversity of Toledo · US

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundSacral neuromodulation has become a widely used treatment for lower urinary tract symptom and dysfunction. It has been observed to benefit sexual function in the domains of arousal and desire. Studies have yet to report markedly increased arousal symptoms as an adverse effect. CASE: We present the case of a 57-year-old woman who developed symptomatic persistent genital arousal following implantation of a neuromodulator. Despite device reprogramming, a trial of the device being shut off, and eventual device removal, she continued to have residual new-onset undesired genital hyper-arousal symptoms.

conclusionOur patient demonstrated markedly increased and persistent arousal symptoms that may be the result of upregulated or alternative activation of sacral nerve pathways. While other case reports describe improvement in persistent genital arousal disorder symptoms through neuromodulation, no studies mention hyperarousal symptoms as an adverse side effect after sacral neuromodulator placement nor persistence despite removal of the implant.

Identifiers

PMID31065392
PMCPMC6466880
OpenAlexW2931066249

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.