ArticleInterface focus2019
Simulating and analysing configurational landscapes of protein-protein contact formation.
Article in Interface focus, 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 6 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
6 citing papers in PubMed.
- Rescaling protein-protein interactions improves Martini 3 for flexible proteins in solution.Nature communications · 2024Article
- Reconciling ASPP-p53 binding mode discrepancies through an ensemble binding framework that bridges crystallography and NMR data.PLoS computational biology · 2024Article
- Combining molecular dynamics simulations and scoring method to computationally model ubiquitylated linker histones in chromatosomes.PLoS computational biology · 2023Article
- Generating a conformational landscape of ubiquitin chains at atomistic resolution by back-mapping based sampling.Frontiers in chemistry · 2022Article
- Non-Canonical Interaction between Calmodulin and Calcineurin Contributes to the Differential Regulation of Plant-Derived Calmodulins on Calcineurin.Journal of chemical information and modeling · 2021Article
- Conformational and functional characterization of artificially conjugated non-canonical ubiquitin dimers.Scientific reports · 2019Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
2 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Interacting proteins can form aggregates and protein-protein interfaces with multiple patterns and different stabilities. Using molecular simulation one would like to understand the formation of these aggregates and which of the observed states are relevant for protein function and recognition. To characterize the complex configurational ensemble of protein aggregates, one needs a quantitative measure for the similarity of structures. We present well-suited descriptors that capture the essential features of non-covalent protein contact formation and domain motion. This set of collective variables is used with a nonlinear multi-dimensional scaling-based dimensionality reduction technique to obtain a low-dimensional representation of the configurational landscape of two ubiquitin proteins from coarse-grained simulations. We show that this two-dimensional representation is a powerful basis to identify meaningful states in the ensemble of aggregated structures and to calculate distributions and free energy landscapes for different sets of simulations. By using a measure to quantitatively compare free energy landscapes we can show how the introduction of a covalent bond between two ubiquitin proteins at different positions alters the configurational states of these dimers.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.