ArticleBiomicrofluidics2019
A microfluidic design for desalination and selective removal and addition of components in biosamples.
Article in Biomicrofluidics, 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- A Highly Sensitive Dual-Drive Microfluidic Device for Multiplexed Detection of Respiratory Virus Antigens.Micromachines · 2024Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
We present the development of a microfluidic device that is able to selectively and nondisturbingly remove or add components to liquid samples, which allows control and conditioning of the samples for biomedical tests. The device consists of a series of chambers for sample retention and a through channel. Because smaller particles diffuse faster, small particles in the sample such as salt ions rapidly escape the chamber by diffusion and are subsequently removed by a carrier flow in the channel, leaving macromolecules of interest in the "desalted" solution. Conversely, components lacking in the sample can be diffused in by reversing the concentration gradient between the flow and the sample chamber. The ability to control the ionic strength of a sample offers many advantages in biological sample preparation as most biofluids contain high salt contents, making them unsuitable for downstream molecular analyses without additional sample treatments which could cause sample loss, contamination, and cost increase. Making use of the nature of laminar flow in a microfluidic device and mass transport by diffusion, we have developed an analytical model to calculate concentration profiles for different particles. Excellent agreements were found between the theory and the experiment, making the results highly reliable and predictable. Since the device and the principle is applicable to a wide range of biological samples, it can be incorporated into the workflow of various applications for research and
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.