ArticleBiomicrofluidics2019
On-chip cell mechanophenotyping using phase modulated surface acoustic wave.
Article in Biomicrofluidics, 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 8 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
8 citing papers in PubMed, 27 citations in OpenAlex.
- MagSculptor: A Microfluidic Platform for High-Resolution Magnetic Fractionation of Low-Expression Cell Subtypes.Biosensors · 2026Article
- Magnetically Sculpted Microfluidics for Continuous-Flow Fractionation of Cell Populations by EpCAM Expression Level.Micromachines · 2025Article
- B cell mechanobiology in health and disease: emerging techniques and insights into therapeutic responses.FEBS letters · 2025Review
- Quantitative Acoustophoresis.ACS nanoscience Au · 2022Article
- Chemical Interrogation of Nuclear Size Identifies Compounds with Cancer Cell Line-Specific Effects on Migration and Invasion.ACS chemical biology · 2022Article
- Current Development in Interdigital Transducer (IDT) Surface Acoustic Wave Devices for Live Cell In Vitro Studies: A Review.Micromachines · 2021Review
- Detection of Rare Objects by Flow Cytometry: Imaging, Cell Sorting, and Deep Learning Approaches.International journal of molecular sciences · 2020Review
- On-chip surface acoustic wave and micropipette aspiration techniques to assess cell elastic properties.Biomicrofluidics · 2020Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
A surface acoustic wave (SAW) microfluidic chip was designed to measure the compressibility of cells and to differentiate cell mechanophenotypes. Polystyrene microbeads and poly(methylmethacrylate) (PMMA) microbeads were first tested in order to calibrate and validate the acoustic field. We observed the prefocused microbeads being pushed into the new pressure node upon phase shift. The captured trajectory matched well with the equation describing acoustic radiation force. The compressibility of polystyrene microbeads and that of PMMA microbeads was calculated, respectively, by fitting the trajectory from the experiment and that simulated by the equation across a range of compressibility values. Following, A549 human alveolar basal epithelial cells (A549 cells), human airway smooth muscle (HASM) cells, and MCF-7 breast cancer cells were tested using the same procedure. The compressibility of each cell from the three cell types was measured also by fitting trajectories between the experiment and that from the equation; the size was measured by image analysis. A549 cells were more compressible than HASM and MCF-7 cells; HASM cells could be further distinguished from MCF-7 cells by cell size. In addition, MCF-7 cells were treated by colchicine and 2-methoxyestradiol to disrupt the cell microtubules and were found to be more compressible. Computer simulation was also carried out to investigate the effect of cell compressibility and cell size due to acoustic radiation force to examine the sensitivity of the measurement. The SAW microfluidic method is capable of differentiating cell types or cells under different conditions based on the cell compressibility and the cell size.
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.