Evidence map›Paper›PMID 31065181›Full record

ArticleMedical journal, Armed Forces India2019

Study of pain response in neonates during venipuncture with a view to analyse utility of topical anaesthetic agent for alleviating pain.

Hardeep Kaur, Vandana Negi, Mukti Sharma, Gaurav Mahajan

Open access · bronzeAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Medical journal, Armed Forces India, 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 6 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
6citing papers in PubMed
1.1field-weighted citation impact, top 19% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

6 citing papers in PubMed, 8 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Trial
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Review
  5. Review
  6. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors.

Hardeep KaurGraded Specialist (Paediatrics), Military Hospital Nasirabad, Rajasthan, India.
Vandana NegiHead of Department (Paediatrics & Neonatology), Base Hospital Delhi Cantt 10, India.
Mukti SharmaHouse no. 73, Sector 5, Chandigarh 160009, India.
Gaurav MahajanGraded Specialist (Medicine), Military Hospital Nasirabad, Rajasthan, India.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundNeonates being nonverbal are unable to express their pain leading to underestimation of their pain and hence insufficient pain relief. Neonatal pain is assessed by pain scales based on the behavioural and physiological changes that occur in response to painful stimuli. This cross sectional study was conducted at a tertiary care centre using Premature Infant Pain Profile (PIPP) score with 4% lidocaine as local anaesthetic agent to produce surface anaesthesia of skin prior to intravenous cannulation.

methodsSample size was collected by simple randomisation method. Our study groups included 50 term and 50 preterm neonates with POG of 28-40 weeks requiring IV cannulation. Heart rate (HR), SpO

resultsThe PIPP score in preterm group before and after anesthesia was 11.28 ± 3.72 and 9.58 ± 3.39. PIPP score in term group before and after anesthesia was 11.54 ± 2.84 and 9.04 ± 2.97. There was reduction in mean PIPP score after using topical anesthetic agent in both study groups and the results were statistically significant.

conclusionThis study found that topical anesthetic agents were effective in reducing pain during venipuncture. Based on the facts of the study, it is recommended that pain scoring should be a part of routine monitoring in neonatal intensive care units and appropriate measures should be used to reduce pain.

Indexed as

Low birth weightNew Ballard ScorePeriod of gestationPremature Infant Pain ProfileTopical anaesthesia

Identifiers

PMID31065181
PMCPMC6495100
OpenAlexW2789728306

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.