Evidence map›Paper›PMID 31065024›Full record

ArticleScientific reports2019

Towards a global DNA barcode reference library for quarantine identifications of lepidopteran stemborers, with an emphasis on sugarcane pests.

Timothy R C Lee, Stacey J Anderson, Lucy T T Tran-Nguyen, Nader Sallam, Bruno P Le Ru, Desmond Conlong, Kevin Powell, Andrew Ward, Andrew Mitchell

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Scientific reports, 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 5 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
5citing papers in PubMed
3.0field-weighted citation impact, top 9% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

5 citing papers in PubMed, 25 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Frontiers in microbiology · 2022
    Review
  4. Article
  5. Insecticidal Terpenes From the Essential Oils ofFrontiers in plant science · 2021
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

9 authors at 5 institutions in 4 countries.

Timothy R C LeeDepartment of Entomology, Australian Museum Research Institute, 1 William St, Darlinghurst, NSW, 2010, Australia. timothy.lee@austmus.gov.au.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0003-2839-3873
Stacey J AndersonBiosecurity Operations, NAQS, Department of Agriculture and Water Resources, 1 Pederson Road, Eaton, NT, 0812, Australia.
Lucy T T Tran-NguyenNorthern Territory Department of Primary Industry and Resources, GPO Box 3000, Darwin, NT, 0801, Australia.
Nader SallamDepartment of Agriculture and Water Resources, 114 Catalina Crescent, Airport Business Park, Cairns Airport, Cairns, QLD, 4870, Australia.
Bruno P Le RuAfrican Insect Science for Food and Health (ICIPE), PO Box 30772-00100, Nairobi, Kenya.
Desmond ConlongDepartment of Conservation Ecology and Entomology, Faculty of AgriSciences, University of Stellenbosch, Private Bag X1, Matieland, Western Cape, 7602, South Africa.
Kevin PowellSugar Research Australia, 71378 Bruce Highway, Gordonvale, QLD, 4865, Australia.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-7152-3517
Andrew WardSugar Research Australia, 50 Meiers Road, Indooroopilly, QLD, 4068, Australia.
Andrew MitchellDepartment of Entomology, Australian Museum Research Institute, 1 William St, Darlinghurst, NSW, 2010, Australia.
Australian Museum · AUSugar Research Australia (Australia) · AUDepartment of Primary Industry and Resources · AUStellenbosch University · ZAUniversité Paris-Sud · FR

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Lepidopteran stemborers are among the most damaging agricultural pests worldwide, able to reduce crop yields by up to 40%. Sugarcane is the world's most prolific crop, and several stemborer species from the families Noctuidae, Tortricidae, Crambidae and Pyralidae attack sugarcane. Australia is currently free of the most damaging stemborers, but biosecurity efforts are hampered by the difficulty in morphologically distinguishing stemborer species. Here we assess the utility of DNA barcoding in identifying stemborer pest species. We review the current state of the COI barcode sequence library for sugarcane stemborers, assembling a dataset of 1297 sequences from 64 species. Sequences were from specimens collected and identified in this study, downloaded from BOLD or requested from other authors. We performed species delimitation analyses to assess species diversity and the effectiveness of barcoding in this group. Seven species exhibited <0.03 K2P interspecific diversity, indicating that diagnostic barcoding will work well in most of the studied taxa. We identified 24 instances of identification errors in the online database, which has hampered unambiguous stemborer identification using barcodes. Instances of very high within-species diversity indicate that nuclear markers (e.g. 18S, 28S) and additional morphological data (genitalia dissection of all lineages) are needed to confirm species boundaries.

Indexed as

DNA Barcoding, TaxonomicPest ControlAnimalsDatabases, GeneticLepidopteraMothsPhylogenyQuarantineSaccharum

Identifiers

PMID31065024
PMCPMC6504866
OpenAlexW2944037693

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.