Evidence map›Paper›PMID 31064805›Full record

Trial reportBMJ open2019

Introducing physically active lessons in UK secondary schools: feasibility study and pilot cluster-randomised controlled trial.

Catherine Gammon, Katie Morton, Andrew Atkin, Kirsten Corder, Andy Daly-Smith, Thomas Quarmby, Marc Suhrcke, David Turner, Esther van Sluijs

Abstract readRandomized Controlled Trial
In one paragraph

Trial report in BMJ open, 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 19 papers, 5 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
19citing papers in PubMed, 5 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

19 citing papers in PubMed, 5 syntheses or guidelines pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Pooled it
  4. Pooled it
  5. Pooled it
  6. Trial
  7. Trial
  8. Mapping Movement Integration in Secondary Schools: A Scoping Review of Evidence.Obesity reviews : an official journal of the International Association for the Study of Obesity · 2026
    Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Review
  16. Article
  17. Using a multi-stakeholder experience-based design process to co-develop the Creating Active Schools Framework.The international journal of behavioral nutrition and physical activity · 2020
    Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

9 authors.

Catherine GammonMRC Epidemiology Unit, University of Cambridge, Cambridge, UK.
Katie MortonMRC Epidemiology Unit, University of Cambridge, Cambridge, UK.
Andrew AtkinMRC Epidemiology Unit, University of Cambridge, Cambridge, UK.
Kirsten CorderMRC Epidemiology Unit, University of Cambridge, Cambridge, UK.
Andy Daly-SmithCarnegie School of Sport, Leeds Beckett University, Leeds, UK.
Thomas QuarmbyCarnegie School of Sport, Leeds Beckett University, Leeds, UK.
Marc SuhrckeCentre for Health Economics, University of York, York, UK.
David TurnerNorwich Medical School, University of East Anglia, Norwich, UK.
Esther van SluijsMRC Epidemiology Unit, University of Cambridge, Cambridge, UK.

Funding

Department of Health PR-R5-0213-25001Medical Research Council MC_UU_12015/7Medical Research Council MR/K023187/1
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

objectivesAssess feasibility, acceptability and costs of delivering a physically active lessons (PAL) training programme to secondary school teachers and explore preliminary effectiveness for reducing pupils' sedentary time. DESIGN AND

settingSecondary schools in East England; one school participated in a pre-post feasibility study, two in a pilot cluster-randomised controlled trial. In the pilot trial, blinding to group assignment was not possible.

participantsAcross studies, 321 randomly selected students (51% male; mean age: 12.9 years), 78 teachers (35% male) and 2 assistant head teachers enrolled; 296 (92%) students, 69 (88%) teachers and 2 assistant head teachers completed the studies.

interventionPAL training was delivered to teachers over two after-school sessions. Teachers were made aware of how to integrate movement into lessons; strategies included students collecting data from the environment for class activities and completing activities posted on classroom walls, instead of sitting at desks. PRIMARY AND SECONDARY OUTCOMES: Quantitative and qualitative data were collected to assess feasibility and acceptability of PAL training and delivery. Outcomes were assessed at baseline and ~8 weeks post-training; measures included accelerometer-assessed activity, self-reported well-being and observations of time-on-task. Process evaluation was conducted at follow-up.

resultsIn the feasibility study, teachers reported good acceptability of PAL training and mixed experiences of delivering PAL. In the pilot study, teachers' acceptability of training was lower and teachers identified aspects of the training in need of review, including the outdoor PAL training and learning challenge of PAL strategies. In both studies, students and assistant head teachers reported good acceptability of the intervention. Preliminary effectiveness for reducing students' sedentary time was not demonstrated in either study.

conclusionsNo evidence of preliminary effectiveness on the primary outcome and mixed reports of teachers' acceptability of PAL training suggest the need to review the training. The results do not support continuation of research with the current intervention. TRIAL REGISTRATION NUMBER: ISRCTN38409550.

Indexed as

ExercisePreventive Health ServicesTeachingChildFeasibility StudiesFemaleHealth BehaviorHealth PromotionHumansMalePilot ProjectsProgram EvaluationSchool Health ServicesSchoolsSedentary BehaviorTeacher Trainingactive lessonsmovement integrationphysical activityschool healthsedentary time

Identifiers

PMID31064805
PMCPMC6527971

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.