Evidence map›Paper›PMID 31064416›Full record

ArticleInternational journal of health geographics2019

Citizen science informs human-tick exposure in the Northeastern United States.

W Tanner Porter, Peter J Motyka, Julie Wachara, Zachary A Barrand, Zahraa Hmood, Marya McLaughlin, Kelsey Pemberton, Nathan C Nieto

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in International journal of health geographics, 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 32 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
32citing papers in PubMed
7.3field-weighted citation impact, top 2% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

32 citing papers in PubMed, 66 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Why are the ticks winning, and what can we do about it?Ticks and tick-borne diseases · 2026
    Review
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Human-BitingMicroorganisms · 2023
    Article
  11. Article
  12. Spatial and seasonal determinants of Lyme borreliosis incidence in France, 2016 to 2021.Euro surveillance : bulletin Europeen sur les maladies transmissibles = European communicable disease bulletin · 2023
    Article
  13. Passive Surveillance of Human-BitingInternational journal of environmental research and public health · 2023
    Article
  14. Review
  15. Tick species infesting humans in the United States.Ticks and tick-borne diseases · 2022
    Review
  16. Article
  17. Review
  18. Article
  19. Identification of an unusual cluster of human granulocytic anaplasmosis in the Estrie region, Québec, Canada in 2021.Canada communicable disease report = Releve des maladies transmissibles au Canada · 2022
    Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

W Tanner PorterDepartment of Biological Sciences, Northern Arizona University, 617 S. Beaver Street, Flagstaff, AZ, 86011, USA. wtp7@nau.edu.ORCID 0000-0002-2611-0924
Peter J MotykaDepartment of Biological Sciences, Northern Arizona University, 617 S. Beaver Street, Flagstaff, AZ, 86011, USA.
Julie WacharaDepartment of Biological Sciences, Northern Arizona University, 617 S. Beaver Street, Flagstaff, AZ, 86011, USA.
Zachary A BarrandDepartment of Biological Sciences, Northern Arizona University, 617 S. Beaver Street, Flagstaff, AZ, 86011, USA.
Zahraa HmoodDepartment of Biological Sciences, Northern Arizona University, 617 S. Beaver Street, Flagstaff, AZ, 86011, USA.
Marya McLaughlinDepartment of Biological Sciences, Northern Arizona University, 617 S. Beaver Street, Flagstaff, AZ, 86011, USA.
Kelsey PembertonDepartment of Biological Sciences, Northern Arizona University, 617 S. Beaver Street, Flagstaff, AZ, 86011, USA.
Nathan C NietoDepartment of Biological Sciences, Northern Arizona University, 617 S. Beaver Street, Flagstaff, AZ, 86011, USA.
Northern Arizona University · US

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundTick-borne disease is the result of spillover of pathogens into the human population. Traditionally, literature has focused on characterization of tick-borne disease pathogens and ticks in their sylvatic cycles. A limited amount of research has focused on human-tick exposure in this system, especially in the Northeastern United States. Human-tick interactions are crucial to consider when assessing the risk of tick-borne disease since a tick bite is required for spillover to occur.

methodsCitizen scientists collected ticks from the Northeastern US through a free nationwide program. Submitted ticks were identified to species, stage, and sex. Blacklegged ticks, Ixodes scapularis, were tested for the presence of Borrelia burgdorferi sensu lato (s.l.) and hard-tick relapsing fever Borrelia. Seasonality of exposure and the citizen science activity during tick exposure was recorded by the citizen scientist. A negative binomial model was fit to predict county level CDC Lyme disease cases in 2016 using citizen science Ixodes scapularis submissions, state, and county population as predictor variables.

resultsA total of 3740 submissions, comprising 4261 ticks, were submitted from the Northeastern US and were reported to be parasitizing humans. Of the three species submitted, blacklegged ticks were the most prevalent followed by American dog ticks and lone star ticks. Submissions peaked in May with the majority of exposure occurring during every-day activities. The most common pathogen in blacklegged ticks was B. burgdorferi s.l. followed by hard-tick relapsing fever Borrelia. Negative binomial model performance was best in New England states followed by Middle Atlantic states.

conclusionsCitizen science provides a low-cost and effective methodology for describing the seasonality and characteristics of human-tick exposure. In the Northeastern US, everyday activities were identified as a major mechanism for tick exposure, supporting the role of peri-domestic exposure in tick-borne disease. Citizen science provides a method for broad pathogen and tick surveillance, which is highly related to human disease, allowing for inferences to be made about the epidemiology of tick-borne disease.

Indexed as

AnimalsBorrelia burgdorferiCitizen ScienceHumansIxodesLyme DiseaseNew EnglandSpecies SpecificityTick BitesTick InfestationsAmblyommaBorreliaCitizen scienceDermacentorIxodesLyme diseaseTick-borne diseaseTicks

Identifiers

PMID31064416
PMCPMC6505254
OpenAlexW2947914849

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.